2012
DOI: 10.1118/1.4712222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardized assessment of new electromagnetic field generators in an interventional radiology setting

Abstract: Due to their high accuracy and robustness, the Tabletop FG and the Compact FG could eliminate the need for compensation of EM field distortions in certain CT-guided interventions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
79
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(32 reference statements)
6
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various automatic registration methods are conceivable 26, 27, 28 and should be compared particularly in terms of their applicability to patient data. In this phantom study, we have selected the rigid coherent point drift registration (CPD),29 which only translates and rotates the dataset of the determined dwell positions by an iterative registration routine minimizing the 3D distance of the dwell position pairs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various automatic registration methods are conceivable 26, 27, 28 and should be compared particularly in terms of their applicability to patient data. In this phantom study, we have selected the rigid coherent point drift registration (CPD),29 which only translates and rotates the dataset of the determined dwell positions by an iterative registration routine minimizing the 3D distance of the dwell position pairs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This device has shown good performance in terms of accuracy and stability [12], which is required for guiding EUS-related procedures. The TTFG has an ellipsoidal volume of 600x420x600 mm starting at approximately 120 mm from the physical plane of the board.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common approach was proposed by Hummel et al [8] and has been used to assess new EM systems [12,13], the accuracy of sensors mounted on US probes [14,15], and also for optimization [16]. This assessment protocol employs a machined base plate to measure positional and rotational tracking data, offering simplicity, reproducibility, a high precision ground truth and accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EM tracking reports the location and orientation of a small (∼1-mm diameter) wired sensor inside a 3-D working volume with a magnetic field created by a field generator. Many groups have studied the accuracy of EM tracking in real or simulated clinical settings, [15][16][17][18] as well as configurations in which an EM sensor is embedded in imaging probes. 19 One limitation of EM tracking is the potential distortion of the magnetic field due to ferrous metals and conductive materials inside the working volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%