2001
DOI: 10.1177/000312240106600307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization vs. Rapport: Respondent laughter and Interviewer Reaction during Telephone Surveys

Abstract: Laughter emerges naturally in interaction. In the context of the telephone survey interview, however, laughter threatens standardization. Consequently, some survey research centers prohibit interviewers from laughing during the administration of surveys. The data for this study are recorded telephone interviews from one such survey research center. How interviewers handle the “laughter invitations” of respondents is analyzed. Because these interviewers are not taught what to do when laughter occurs, they rely … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing on this key insight from the emotional aperture literature, we propose that witnessing followers consider both the leader’s and the questioner’s laughter when assessing the leader’s warmth because the emerging pattern of laughter between the leader and the critical questioner helps them discern the intent of the leader’s laughter. Qualitative research on laughter in social interactions shows that laughter tends to exhibit different patterns within social interactions (e.g., Adelswärd & Öberg, 1998; Glenn, 2003, 2010; Holt, 2010; Jefferson, 1979; Kangasharju & Nikko, 2009; Lavin & Maynard, 2001). Scholars contend that affiliative laughter tends to be shared within an interaction (Jefferson, 1979), a prediction confirmed by findings in the field of conversational analysis that have found one person’s affiliative laughter is almost immediately joined by another person’s laughter during interactions (Adelswärd & Öberg, 1998; Kangasharju & Nikko, 2009).…”
Section: Social Interactionist Approach To Laughtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on this key insight from the emotional aperture literature, we propose that witnessing followers consider both the leader’s and the questioner’s laughter when assessing the leader’s warmth because the emerging pattern of laughter between the leader and the critical questioner helps them discern the intent of the leader’s laughter. Qualitative research on laughter in social interactions shows that laughter tends to exhibit different patterns within social interactions (e.g., Adelswärd & Öberg, 1998; Glenn, 2003, 2010; Holt, 2010; Jefferson, 1979; Kangasharju & Nikko, 2009; Lavin & Maynard, 2001). Scholars contend that affiliative laughter tends to be shared within an interaction (Jefferson, 1979), a prediction confirmed by findings in the field of conversational analysis that have found one person’s affiliative laughter is almost immediately joined by another person’s laughter during interactions (Adelswärd & Öberg, 1998; Kangasharju & Nikko, 2009).…”
Section: Social Interactionist Approach To Laughtermentioning
confidence: 99%