2001
DOI: 10.1116/1.1342006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Standardization” of field emission measurements

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inStandardized assessment of new electromagnetic field generators in an interventional radiology setting Med. Phys. 39, 3424 (2012); 10.1118/1.4712222 Vacuum measurement by carbon nanotube field emissiona)Integrally gated carbon nanotube field emission cathodes produced by standard microfabrication techniques A compact electron energy analyzer for measuring field emission energy distributions Rev.Interest in field emission and field emission devices has been renewed in the last 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5) [18,19]. The turn-on electric field, defined as the applied electric field at the emission current density of 10 lA/m 2 , was used to characterize the nano-structures [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) [18,19]. The turn-on electric field, defined as the applied electric field at the emission current density of 10 lA/m 2 , was used to characterize the nano-structures [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] A plot of ln(J/E 2 ) versus 1/E yields a straight line with a slope of about ±134 at high applied fields (Fig. 4a, inset), demonstrating the field emission phenomenon.…”
Section: ±1mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…10, the work function and emission area derived from the field emission characteristics employing the Fowler-Nordheim formalism may significantly differ from their actual values. We believe the terms ''apparent'' or ''effective'' ͑work function or area͒ are best employed to emphasize this distinction.…”
Section: ͑Received 4 November 2002; Accepted 5 March 2003͒mentioning
confidence: 95%