2023
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization of Data Analysis for RT-QuIC-Based Detection of Chronic Wasting Disease

Abstract: Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is a disease affecting cervids and is caused by prions accumulating as pathogenic fibrils in lymphoid tissue and the central nervous system. Approaches for detecting CWD prions historically relied on antibody-based assays. However, recent advancements in protein amplification technology provided the foundation for a new class of CWD diagnostic tools. In particular, real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) has rapidly become a feasible option for CWD diagnosis. Despite its in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, our findings demonstrated the effectiveness of using ROC and AUC analyses for optimizing RT-QuIC assay durations in screening CWD as an alternative to ELISA. As many factors may affect RT-QuIC performance [ 9 , 27 , 28 ], it is expected that the optimal assay duration may vary for different sample matrixes, with different substrates and reagents, and using different fluorometers. In addition, with ROC curves, there are multiple methods to interpret the optimal threshold cut-offs, such as the Youden index and the point closest to the (0,1) method [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, our findings demonstrated the effectiveness of using ROC and AUC analyses for optimizing RT-QuIC assay durations in screening CWD as an alternative to ELISA. As many factors may affect RT-QuIC performance [ 9 , 27 , 28 ], it is expected that the optimal assay duration may vary for different sample matrixes, with different substrates and reagents, and using different fluorometers. In addition, with ROC curves, there are multiple methods to interpret the optimal threshold cut-offs, such as the Youden index and the point closest to the (0,1) method [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of optimal assay duration time for T MPR was based on the same ThT data from the above RT-QuIC reactions that were seeded with the control CWD+ and CWD− brain and RLN tissue homogenates. MPR was defined as the ratio of maximum RFU to background (4th cycle) RFU by Rowden et al [ 9 ]. In this study, MPR was calculated for each cycle using the maximum accumulated RFU, from the 4th cycle (52 min of the assay) to the 224th cycle (65 h), using the maximum accumulated RFU within the corresponding cycles, and thus, 221 MPRs were calculated from each reaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations