Standardization meets stories: Contrasting perspectives on the needs of frail individuals at a rehabilitation unit

Abstract

BackgroundRepeated encounters over time enable general practitioners (GPs) to accumulate biomedical and biographical knowledge about their patients. A growing body of evidence documenting the medical relevance of lifetime experiences indicates that health personnel ought to appraise this type of knowledge and consider how to incorporate it into their treatment of patients. In order to explore the interdisciplinary communication of such knowledge within Norwegian health care, we conducted a research project at the interface between general practice and a nursing home.MethodsIn the present study, nine Norwegian GPs were each interviewed about one of their patients who had recently been admitted to a nursing home for short-term rehabilitation. A successive interview conducted with each of these patients aimed at both validating the GP's information and exploring the patient's life story. The GP's treatment opinions and the patient's biographical information and treatment preferences were condensed into a biographical record presented to the nursing home staff. The transcripts of the interviews and the institutional treatment measures were compared and analysed, applying a phenomenological–hermeneutical framework. In the present article, we compare and discuss: (1) the GPs’ specific recommendations for their patients; (2) the patients’ own wishes and perceived needs; and (3) if and how this information was integrated into the institution's interventions and priorities.ResultsEach GP made rehabilitation recommendations, which included statements regarding both the patient's personality and life circumstances. The nursing home staff individualized their selection of therapeutic interventions based on defined standardized treatment approaches, without personalizing them.ConclusionWe found that the institutional voice of medicine consistently tends to override the voice of the patient's lifeworld. Thus, despite the institution's best intentions, their efforts to provide appropriate rehabilitation seem to have been jeopardized to some extent.

Origins of heath inequalities: the case for Allostatic Load

“…The presented connection between allostatic load and the phenomenon embodiment ) is highly concordant with our thinking (Getz, Kirkengen, & Ulvestad, 2011;Kirkengen, 2001Kirkengen, , 2010Kirkengen et al, 2015;Kirkengen & Thornquist, 2012;Mjolstad, Kirkengen, Getz, & Hetlevik, 2013;Thornquist & Kirkengen, 2015;Tomasdottir et al, 2014;Tomasdottir et al, 2015;Vogt, Ulvestad, Eriksen, & Getz, 2014). The interrelatedness of human biology and biography has long been evident to experienced doctors in general practice (GPs) who encounter individuals over time across varying circumstances and stages of life (Kirkengen, 2005).…”

Stroke follow-up in primary care: a discourse study on the discharge summary as a tool for knowledge transfer and collaboration

“…In other parts of medicine, the doctor-patient relationship most often is of short duration. In general practice, the continuous relationship with the patient is essential, the GP must be pragmatic and the clinical practice can only to a limited extent be based on science [ 33 , 34 ].…”

Community Reintegration Following a Total Joint Replacement: A Pilot Study

“…With a focus on exploring individuals' personal lived experience of re-engaging in the community following a TJR and describing how meaning is derived, we employed a descriptive phenomenological approach as our guiding theoretical perspective (Lopez and Willis, 2004;Todres and Holloway, 2004;Tuohy et al, 2013). Phenomenology is both a philosophical perspective and a method employed to study the meaning of personal experiences, and has been used in healthcare contexts to study personal experiences with illness, care and recovery (MacDermid et al, 2013;Mjølstad et al, 2013;Parsons et al, 2009).…”