The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.02.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization, decay data measurements and evaluation of 64Cu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…64 Cu was historically produced by a nuclear reactor, both by carrier‐added neutron activation 63 Cu(n,γ) 64 Cu and under no‐carrier‐added conditions with fast neutrons by 64 Zn(n,p) 64 Cu . The radionuclide is presently produced using a cyclotron via the 64 Ni(p,n) 64 Cu nuclear reaction, with an incident energy of approximately 11 to 14 MeV, although another option being investigated is the 64 Ni(d,2n) 64 Cu production method .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 Cu was historically produced by a nuclear reactor, both by carrier‐added neutron activation 63 Cu(n,γ) 64 Cu and under no‐carrier‐added conditions with fast neutrons by 64 Zn(n,p) 64 Cu . The radionuclide is presently produced using a cyclotron via the 64 Ni(p,n) 64 Cu nuclear reaction, with an incident energy of approximately 11 to 14 MeV, although another option being investigated is the 64 Ni(d,2n) 64 Cu production method .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the past 10 years, several laboratories have reported on the measurement of decay data for 64 Cu (Qaim et al 2007, Wanke et al 2010, Luca et al 2012, Bé et al 2012). Many of these studies were conducted by National Metrology Institutes during the course of the development of primary national standards for this radionuclide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these was conducted by Singh (2007) as part of the Evaluated Nuclear Data Structure File (ENSDF), while the most recent was performed by Bé et al (2011) as part of the Decay Data Evaluation Project (DDEP). Because they were published subsequent to the ENSDF evaluation, the recent measurements from Wanke et al (2010), Luca et al (2012), and Bé et al (2012) are only considered in the DDEP evaluation. The evaluated half-life from the DDEP evaluation is (12.7004 ± 0.0020) hours (Bé et al 2011), while the ENSDF evaluation gives a recommended half-life of (12.701 ± 0.002) hours (Singh 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precise value of half life is directly used in nuclear medicine units for the calculation of activity at the moment of administration. (Bé et al 2011). RML standardized absolutely solutions from 64 Cu and 68 Ga by the coincidence method .…”
Section: High Resolution Spectrometric Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%