2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00825-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization and Quality Assurance in Life-Science Research - Crucially Needed or Unnecessary and Annoying Regulation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the general documentation improves the traceability and transparency of research findings to prove the reliability of results. Such quality control systems should be based on and be in line with good laboratory practices (GLP), well-defined and validated protocols, and comprehensive SOPs [24][25]. The advantages of implementing SOPs in the daily workflow of academic researchers might not be immediately obvious and enlighten everyone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the general documentation improves the traceability and transparency of research findings to prove the reliability of results. Such quality control systems should be based on and be in line with good laboratory practices (GLP), well-defined and validated protocols, and comprehensive SOPs [24][25]. The advantages of implementing SOPs in the daily workflow of academic researchers might not be immediately obvious and enlighten everyone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%