Standardization and normative data for a new test of visual long-term recognition memory

Barvas, Edoardo; Mattavelli, Giulia; Meli, Claudia; Guttmann, Susanna; Papagno, Costanza

doi:10.1007/s10072-021-05642-z

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Like simulation A, simulation B was conducted on a sample of 300 not-normally distributed scores. However, in this simulation, the scores represent a test in which the higher score represents better performance, such as a memory recall test [15][16][17]. As a consequence, the npTLs are one-sided in the left part of the distribution.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A rank subdivision of equivalent score for enhancing neuropsychological test norms

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Neuropsychological assessment of cognitive functioning is a crucial part of clinical care: diagnosis, treatment planning, treatment evaluation, research, and prediction of long-term outcomes. The Equivalent Score (ES) method is used to score numerous neuropsychological tests. The ES0 and the ES4 are defined respectively by the outer tolerance limit and the median. The intermediate ESs are commonly calculated using a z-score approach even when the distribution of neuropsychological data is typically non-parametric. To calculate more accurate ESs, we propose that the intermediate ESs need to be calculated based on a non-parametric rank subdivision of the distribution of the adjusted scores. Material and methods We make three simulations to explain the differences between the classical z-score approach, the rank-based approach, and the direct subdivision of the dependent variable. Results The results show that the rank procedure permits dividing the region between ES0 and ES4 into three areas with the same density. The z-score procedure is quite similar to the direct subdivision of the dependent variable and different from the rank subdivision. Conclusions By subdividing intermediate ESs using the rank-subdivision, neuropsychological tests can be scored more accurately, also considering that the two essential points for diagnosis (ES = 0 and ES = 4) remain the same. Future normative data definition should consider the best procedure for scoring with ES.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A rank subdivision of equivalent score for enhancing neuropsychological test norms

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Notably, despite the extensive body of literature supporting the use of recognition memory paradigms to enhance differential diagnosis between neurological patients, depressed ones and healthy controls [ 29 ], its clinical assessment is still limited due to the paucity of validated, clinical tools available. As for the Italian population, only the verbal and non-verbal recognition memory test (RMT) [ 30 ] and the visual long-term recognition memory test [ 31 ] are available. The RMT represents a relatively fast screening tool, which may be useful for the early detection of memory disorders; two parallel versions are also available for multiple testing [ 32 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Verbal and non-verbal recognition memory assessment: validation of a computerized version of the Recognition Memory Test

Baruzzo,

Terruzzi,

Feder

et al. 2023

Neurol Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The use of computerized devices for neuropsychological assessment (CNADs) as an effective alternative to the traditional pencil-and-paper modality has recently increased exponentially, both in clinical practice and research, especially due to the pandemic. However, several authors underline that the computerized modality requires the same psychometric validity as "in-presence" tests. The current study aimed at building and validating a computerized version of the verbal and non-verbal recognition memory test (RMT) for words, unknown faces and buildings. Methods Seventy-two healthy Italian participants, with medium–high education and ability to proficiently use computerized systems, were enrolled. The sample was subdivided into six groups, one for each age decade. Twelve neurological patients with mixed aetiology, age and educational level were also recruited. Both the computerized and the paper-and-pencil versions of the RMT were administered in two separate sessions. Results In healthy participants, the computerized and the paper-and-pencil versions of the RMT showed statistical equivalence for words, unknown faces and buildings. In the neurological patients, no statistical difference was found between the performance at the two versions of the RMT. A moderate-to-good inter-rater reliability between the two versions was also found in both samples. Finally, the computerized version of the RMT was perceived as acceptable by both healthy participants and neurological patients at System Usability Scale (SUS). Conclusion The computerized version of the RMT can be used as a reliable alternative to the traditional version.

show abstract

Cognitive profile in a young woman with Susac syndrome: a case report

Basagni,

Abbruzzese,

Radicchi

et al. 2024

Neurocase

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standardization and normative data for a new test of visual long-term recognition memory

Cited by 3 publications

References 21 publications

A rank subdivision of equivalent score for enhancing neuropsychological test norms

A rank subdivision of equivalent score for enhancing neuropsychological test norms

Verbal and non-verbal recognition memory assessment: validation of a computerized version of the Recognition Memory Test

Cognitive profile in a young woman with Susac syndrome: a case report

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About