2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardising bull breeding soundness evaluations and reporting in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AGECL was estimated from annotation of the date when the first CL was observed and the date of birth. Scrotal circumference (SC) was measured with a standard metal tape (Fordyce et al 2006). Between weaning and 24 months of age, eight measurements of SC were taken for each bull, at 3-month intervals.…”
Section: Cattle and Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AGECL was estimated from annotation of the date when the first CL was observed and the date of birth. Scrotal circumference (SC) was measured with a standard metal tape (Fordyce et al 2006). Between weaning and 24 months of age, eight measurements of SC were taken for each bull, at 3-month intervals.…”
Section: Cattle and Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Society for Theriogenology standard makes provision for classification to be deferred pending further evaluations in bulls which do not fully satisfy the criteria for a satisfactory potential breeder [9]. The Australian standard classifies bulls as fertile, subfertile or infertile depending on the parameters for different traits [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parallels the situation in other countries, where similar requirements for standardisation resulted in the development of guidelines for bull breeding soundness certification by the Society for Theriogenology in 1983 [8], with an updated set of guidelines being published in 1993 [9]. A recent article describes the process of devising an industry standard for examination of bulls in Australia [10]. In this context the revised South African standard of 2000, which has been in use for six years and has been recently updated, is presented here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Ten 2-yr-old Santa Gertrudis bulls with a mean initial live weight of 794.0 kg (SD 55.6) were selected for use in this study. The bulls were selected from a seed stock herd -ern Queensland, Australia, and then transported 260 -periment were based on bulls having passed consecutive standardized bull breeding soundness evaluations (Entwistle and Fordyce, 2003;Fordyce et al, 2006), -logically normal spermatozoa at both evaluations. Bulls were administered vitamin A, D, and E (Vitamec ADE; Cattlekare, Dandenong, VIC, Australia; 5 mL intramuscular [i.m.])…”
Section: Animals and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were allowed to clot at room temperature and then centrifuged (3,000 × g for -FSH, testosterone, inhibin, and cortisol concentrations. Bull breeding soundness examinations were performed according to the standardized bull breeding soundness evaluation procedure (Fordyce et al, 2006), including semen analysis and categorization of sperm abnormalities. After preliminary stimulation via rectal massage to the ampullae, semen was collected using a Lane ejaculator (Lane Pulsator IV; Lane Manufacturing Inc., Denver, CO) and standard electroejaculation technique (Entwistle and Fordyce, 2003;McAuliffe et al, 2010).…”
Section: Measurement and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%