2018
DOI: 10.1080/17452759.2018.1532801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardised product development for technology integration of additive manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new measurement method is especially suitable for LFTs with a large sample size and can be used to generate accurate results with a strong repeatability while minimizing the manual handling effort. It is shown that the taken measurements agree with the outcome of previously reported studies [12,39,41]. Aside from the epoxy plug method, the comparative study concentrated on two other fiber analysis methods: first, a full fiber analysis, which is a proprietary measurement system developed by SABIC (Geleen, Netherlands) and based on the work by Krasteva [42]; and second, the FASEP method, which is a commercially available analysis method proprietary to IDM Systems (Darmstadt, Germany).…”
Section: Motivationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The new measurement method is especially suitable for LFTs with a large sample size and can be used to generate accurate results with a strong repeatability while minimizing the manual handling effort. It is shown that the taken measurements agree with the outcome of previously reported studies [12,39,41]. Aside from the epoxy plug method, the comparative study concentrated on two other fiber analysis methods: first, a full fiber analysis, which is a proprietary measurement system developed by SABIC (Geleen, Netherlands) and based on the work by Krasteva [42]; and second, the FASEP method, which is a commercially available analysis method proprietary to IDM Systems (Darmstadt, Germany).…”
Section: Motivationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The results showed that the platform can work on dynamic and iterative PDPs, as well as reduce the time and cost of product development. Another piece of research that achieved similar results was Rohde et al (2019). These authors performed a study of AM to develop a process chain to minimize the challenges of AM implementation.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…With the rise of computer-controlled machines, the latter problem is solved to some extent, but the material waste is still a challenge [25]. In the current era, which is also known as the fourth revolution of industry, Industry 4.0, it was decided to utilize the physical facilities with modern information technology [26,27]. The goal of this integration is that the control over different manufacturing processes will reduce while it is possible to make the fabrication in fewer steps with less time and material waste leading to a higher benefit-cost ratio [28].…”
Section: An Introduction To Ammentioning
confidence: 99%