2020
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardised Nomenclature, Abbreviations, and Units for the Study of Bone Marrow Adiposity: Report of the Nomenclature Working Group of the International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
(145 reference statements)
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Units and abbreviations are reported in accordance with recently published guidelines for research relating to BM adiposity 71 . Where representative micrographs or PET/CT images are shown, figure legends describe the number of biologically independent samples that these are representative of.…”
Section: A Table Of Key Resources Is Included In the Supplement (Suppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Units and abbreviations are reported in accordance with recently published guidelines for research relating to BM adiposity 71 . Where representative micrographs or PET/CT images are shown, figure legends describe the number of biologically independent samples that these are representative of.…”
Section: A Table Of Key Resources Is Included In the Supplement (Suppmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BMAS Working Group in Methodologies and the collaborative BMAS community at large present the opportunity to reach methodological consensus guidelines and propose minimal standards that would strengthen the quality of our scientific output, increase comparability and prepare the field for multi-site preclinical and clinical studies which can pave the way to sound clinical translation. As a first step, incorporation of the BMAS nomenclature guidelines presented in the accompanying piece of this issue (31) and adherence to the methodology reporting guidelines presented here ( Table 1) will ensure a common language for our community. In addition, we would like to invite readers to contribute by commenting on this review in the comments section of the "Frontiers in Endocrinology" website.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two types of dimensional quantification are possible: two dimensional in terms of perimeter, diameter and area, and three dimensional in terms of volume and surface (29). Moreover, as described in the consensus on bone histomorphometry (30) and extensively discussed in the accompanying BMAS nomenclature position paper, BMA parameters should be presented in relation to a reference region (31). By using a common referent, it is possible to assess changes in the number or percentage of adipocytes following an intervention or comparing physiological and pathological states.…”
Section: Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the initial manual steps performed by the user in setting "Tissue Boundaries, " excluding "Artifacts, " and defining the "Background" within the QuPath environment as described above ( Figure 3B), the MarrowQuant plugin first identifies the bone compartment within the given "Tissue Boundaries." The bone mask is then subtracted to generate the total area of interest that we define as the "Total Marrow Area" (Ma.Ar) ascribing to the nomenclature recommendations for BMA (32). Within the "Total Marrow Area, " nucleated cells are detected to generate the "Hematopoietic Cellularity" mask.…”
Section: Bone Marrow Quantification With Marrowquantmentioning
confidence: 99%