2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardised Frailty Indicator as Predictor for Postoperative Delirium after Vascular Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract: The GFI can be helpful in the early identification of POD after vascular surgery in a select group of high-risk patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
90
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(17 reference statements)
6
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incident data and audits of admission risk, performed in my clinical role, showed similar levels of risk of falls and pressure ulcers in older medical and surgical ward patients. Pilot studies at RBWH to reduce geriatric syndromes and improve outcomes in acute medical patients had shown promising results (30)(31)(32)(33). A better understanding of the occurrence of geriatric syndromes in older surgical ward patients would inform the potential for broader applicability of these interventions with vulnerable older surgical groups.…”
Section: The Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Incident data and audits of admission risk, performed in my clinical role, showed similar levels of risk of falls and pressure ulcers in older medical and surgical ward patients. Pilot studies at RBWH to reduce geriatric syndromes and improve outcomes in acute medical patients had shown promising results (30)(31)(32)(33). A better understanding of the occurrence of geriatric syndromes in older surgical ward patients would inform the potential for broader applicability of these interventions with vulnerable older surgical groups.…”
Section: The Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study design varied and included twenty-two prospective studies, two retrospective studies and one cross-sectional study. Five of the included studies were sub-group analyses of larger studies (27)(28)(29)(30)(31). Several studies reported findings for more than one outcome (10,24,30,32,33).…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations