2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.11.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardisation of 64Cu using a software coincidence counting system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cu-64 activities were calculated by extrapolation of data acquired with a gate set over the 1346 keV gamma-ray peak, as has been described by others (Kawada, 1986; Wanke et al, 2010; Sahagia et al, 2012; Bé et al, 2012; Havelka and Sochorová, 2014). Data acquired on analog and digital (with off-line analysis) systems returned activities that consistently agreed to < 0.1 %.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cu-64 activities were calculated by extrapolation of data acquired with a gate set over the 1346 keV gamma-ray peak, as has been described by others (Kawada, 1986; Wanke et al, 2010; Sahagia et al, 2012; Bé et al, 2012; Havelka and Sochorová, 2014). Data acquired on analog and digital (with off-line analysis) systems returned activities that consistently agreed to < 0.1 %.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of anti-coincident to total counts in each gate gave the inefficiency parameters Y 1 , Y 2 , and Y 3 , used for activity determinations. Previous standardizations of 64 Cu have followed Kawada (1986), plotting N LS vs. Y 3 and taking the activity ( N 0 ) to be the intercept ( N LS (0)) using a linear extrapolation (Wanke et al, 2010; Sahagia et al, 2012; Bé et al, 2012; Havelka and Sochorová, 2014), NLS=N0(1Y3). Using this extrapolation without further correction ignores the difference in K/L/M electron capture ratios between the two electron capture branches, which is expected to cause a bias in the intercept (Funck and Nylandstedt Larsen, 1983). This approach also ignores any effect of the positron or beta branch inefficiencies being non-linear functions of Y 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recently performed a primary standardization of 64 Cu activity (Bergeron et al, 2017). The standard was realized by live-timed anticoincidence (LTAC) counting, gating on the 1346 keV gamma peak as described by Kawada (1986) and others (Wanke et al, 2010; Sahagia et al, 2012; Bé et al, 2012; Havelka and Sochorová, 2014). The very small emission probability of the 1346 keV γ-ray (0.4748 %; Bé et al, 2011) requires longer-than-typical count times and makes the measurement somewhat difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Determinação das probabilidades de emissão gama por decaimento destes radionuclídeos por meio de medidas absolutas e em espectrômetro de HPGe calibrado. (CHRISTMAS et al, 1983;KAWADA, 1986) como os mais recentes (QAIM, et al, 2007;WANKE et al;LUCA, et al, 2012;AMIOT, et al, 2012;SAHAGIA, et al, 2012;BÉ, et al, 2012;HAVELKA and SOCHOROVÁ , 2014;PIBIDA et al, 2017) (VOLKERT et al, 1991;NIJSEN et al, 2001;BREITZ et al, 2006;COSTA, 2008;LIBERAL, 2013;RANJBAR et al, 2015;ZOLGHADRI et al, 2015;TEHRANI, 2016 (OKUNO e YOSHIMURA, 2010;KRANE, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified