2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf03034491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardisation de la classification morphologique des spermatozoïdes humains selon la méthode de David modifiée

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
48
0
33

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
48
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…By reason of modifications in this classification, the evolution of 'normal sperm morphology' and of 'bent tail' is presented until the end of 2002. For the neck, midpiece and tail, the abnormalities described by Auger and Eustache, 32 'asymetrical insertion', 'thin midpiece' and 'irregular tail' did not appear in the David classification. The other abnormalities were studied over the 20 years of the study.…”
Section: Semen Analysismentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By reason of modifications in this classification, the evolution of 'normal sperm morphology' and of 'bent tail' is presented until the end of 2002. For the neck, midpiece and tail, the abnormalities described by Auger and Eustache, 32 'asymetrical insertion', 'thin midpiece' and 'irregular tail' did not appear in the David classification. The other abnormalities were studied over the 20 years of the study.…”
Section: Semen Analysismentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Since the opening of the laboratory, the strictest criteria have been applied. All semen samples wereanalysed according to standard methods, [29][30][31][32] and efforts were made to keep the technique of semen analysis unchanged. Only the parameters which did not change over time were taken into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another potential weakness of our study is that sperm morphology was assessed using the David classification rather than strict (Tygerberg) criteria. However, we believe that the application of the 4 % thresholds (the 5th percentile from the new WHO reference range) is appropriate given that the new WHO semen analysis morphology reference values were derived in large part from studies using the David morphology classification [23,[25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After liquefaction of semen, the semen analysis was performed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and included assessment of semen volume, sperm concentration, % progressive motility. The % normal morphology was assessed according to the modified David classification after Harris-Schorr staining [23][24][25]. The David classification of morphological anomalies of human spermatozoa was developed in the 1970s and modified in the early 1990s to account for all of the defects known to interfere with normal sperm functions.…”
Section: Semen Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%