2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(03)00102-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardisation and establishment of a rabies ELISA test in European laboratories for assessing the efficacy of oral fox vaccination campaigns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
14
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
14
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…7). These findings correlated well with the observation as performed earlier with ELISA using Glycoprotein antigen taking positive and negative control serum for standardization and establishment of a rabies test for assessing the efficacy of oral fox vaccination campaigns [5]. Capture ELISA based on monoclonal antibodies to rabies nucleoprotein (N) and glycoprotein (G) was developed to detect immune complexes to rabies N and G proteins [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…7). These findings correlated well with the observation as performed earlier with ELISA using Glycoprotein antigen taking positive and negative control serum for standardization and establishment of a rabies test for assessing the efficacy of oral fox vaccination campaigns [5]. Capture ELISA based on monoclonal antibodies to rabies nucleoprotein (N) and glycoprotein (G) was developed to detect immune complexes to rabies N and G proteins [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In recent years, multiple ELISA techniques have been described for quantification of rabies antibodies (Cliquet et al 2003). Even though they are quick and simple, their disadvantage is that they detect almost all IgG antibodies that bind to the antigen-coated plates, and not only the actual anti-rabies neutralizing antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following controls were used -NC R3 (non-reactive TRIS-EDTA), PC R4a (0.5 EU/ml canine serum with anti-rabies IgG), PC R4b (4 EU/ml canine serum with antirabies IgG). Samples with a titre > 0.5 EU/ml were considered positive/seroconverted (Cliquet et al 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, recommended serological methods include the rapid fluorescent foci inhibition test (RFFIT) (Smith et al 1996) and the fluorescent antibody virus neutralisation test (FAVN) (Cliquet et al 1998). In addition, several enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) have also been developed to detect rabies-specific antibodies in animals, and most of them have been validated for their applicability with wildlife samples (Cliquet et al 2003;Servat et al 2008;De Benedictis et al 2012). In 2010, eight out of the 11 EU countries implementing ORV programs adopted an ELISA method to monitor vaccine efficacy, with two using RFFIT and one using FAVN as gold-standards for comparison (De Benedictis et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%