2021
DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2021.1930012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard Synthetic Control Methods: The Case of Using All Preintervention Outcomes Together With Covariates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
75
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, using all lagged outcome variables avoids the problem of omitting potentially irrelevant covariates. Indeed, this practice eliminates all other predictors' effects so that the synthetic counterfactual is created regardless of the other predictors' values (Kaul et al, 2021). This specification is the one that minimizes the root mean squared prediction error (RMSPE) in the pre-treatment period, and that is not subject to arbitrary decisions.…”
Section: Specification Searchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, using all lagged outcome variables avoids the problem of omitting potentially irrelevant covariates. Indeed, this practice eliminates all other predictors' effects so that the synthetic counterfactual is created regardless of the other predictors' values (Kaul et al, 2021). This specification is the one that minimizes the root mean squared prediction error (RMSPE) in the pre-treatment period, and that is not subject to arbitrary decisions.…”
Section: Specification Searchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this finding gives indirect support to the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions in reducing the mortality rate, there is still a need for a criterion to select a given specification from a set of possible alternatives. It is well known that when covariates are expected to be useless in explaining the outcome, the recommended specification should use all pre-treatment outcome lags, i.e., specification (a0) (Kaul et al, 2021). However, if the control unit should also match several socio-economically relevant covariates, attention should be paid to the specifications allowing external predictors.…”
Section: Specification Searchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we focus only on episodes of multilateral trade sanctions, that is sanctions imposed by the UN and/or jointly imposed by the EU and the US. We select the countries meeting the following conditions: (a) the treated country and the control group must 11 There is a debate about the optimal choice of predictor variables, and Kaul et al (2021) show that estimation results can vary considerably when the usage of outcome lags as predictors is restricted. As a robustness check, we also add a fairly standard set of trade predictors such as real per capita GDP, population, total trade (as a percentage of GDP), a war dummy, and the Polity IV dichotomous indicator for democracy.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applications the covariate matrix X a may contain some elements of Z a . In cases where X a contains all pre-treatment outcomes, Kaul et al (2015) has shown that the predictor weights V will give no weight to auxillary covariates (covariates that are not the pre-treatment outcomes), rendering these irrelevant to the model.…”
Section: Variable Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%