2014 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/tale.2014.7062582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard setting in students assessment of higher education institution in Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in line with the findings of Stone, Koskey and Sondergeld (2011) whose study included five-year successive investigation by using examination data, examinees were at good performance with a favourable standing, where students who participated in the exercises fell within advanced and proficient standing. In contrary to the finding of this study, Khatimin, Zaharim and Aziz (2014) however, found that, after identifying the mastery levels of -0.08 logits, 74% of the examinees were categorized into performance levels below basic and that, only 26% of the students attained the acceptable mastery levels. This means that, the students in their study did not reach the mastery levels to answer the questions correctly.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Recommendationcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in line with the findings of Stone, Koskey and Sondergeld (2011) whose study included five-year successive investigation by using examination data, examinees were at good performance with a favourable standing, where students who participated in the exercises fell within advanced and proficient standing. In contrary to the finding of this study, Khatimin, Zaharim and Aziz (2014) however, found that, after identifying the mastery levels of -0.08 logits, 74% of the examinees were categorized into performance levels below basic and that, only 26% of the students attained the acceptable mastery levels. This means that, the students in their study did not reach the mastery levels to answer the questions correctly.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Recommendationcontrasting
confidence: 99%