2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard polypropylene mesh vs lightweight mesh for Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Our research shows no significant difference in wound complications, hernia recurrence and chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernioplasty, by using of LW and HW meshes. The usage of the LW mesh was associated with less feeling of foreign body than that of the HW mesh, what can be considered as prevalence of LW mesh hernioplasty.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to previous trials, we have used an expertise-based design, possibly counteracting bias introduced by individual surgeons preferring a certain type of mesh while allocated to operate with the other type. However, our findings that local groin symptoms were more prevalent with the heavyweight mesh are consistent with the aforementioned research [ 9 11 ]. We also demonstrated that most patients had a better quality of life after inguinal hernia surgery, which too is in accordance with previous research [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in contrast to previous trials, we have used an expertise-based design, possibly counteracting bias introduced by individual surgeons preferring a certain type of mesh while allocated to operate with the other type. However, our findings that local groin symptoms were more prevalent with the heavyweight mesh are consistent with the aforementioned research [ 9 11 ]. We also demonstrated that most patients had a better quality of life after inguinal hernia surgery, which too is in accordance with previous research [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A systematic review of nine trials comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh showed that there is a reduction in chronic pain with the lightweight mesh [ 9 ], while two recent trials have not been able to show any differences according to mesh type [ 10 , 11 ]. In the current study, we could not discern any advantage with the lightweight mesh regarding chronic pain, despite an adequately powered trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a long-term projection, this fact may contribute to a more physiological abdominal wall compliance after LW polypropylene mesh implantation [7]. Furthermore, our decision to use a LW class allograft is supported by some larger clinical trials that demonstrated that the usage of the LW meshes was associated with less feeling of a foreign body by the patient compared to using a HW mesh, what can be considered as prevalence of LW mesh hernioplasty [8].…”
Section: Experimental Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesh fixation has become controversial, and non‐fixation methods like fibrin glue have shown lower pain while not affecting recurrence rates 11‐13 . On the other hand, in open surgery, the use of light‐weight meshes may lead to decreased postoperative pain and discomfort 14‐16 . Therefore, although it was shown in existing controlled studies that laparoscopic repair has an advantage over open repair on account of less postoperative pain, it may differ in the contemporary clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%