28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 1992
DOI: 10.2514/6.1992-3905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard model testing in the European High Enthalpy Facility F4 andextrapolation to flight

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical method is validated by flight data of the ELECTRE vehicle [12,21] and test measurement data in the arc-heated wind tunnel [22]. The ELECTRE vehicle is a sphero-conical configuration with an overall length of 2 m, cone half-angle of 4.6 degrees, and nose radius of 0.175 m. One trajectory point is chosen with the free stream condition of altitude 53.3 km and Mach number 13 [21]. The fixed wall temperature of 343 K is assumed for the fully catalytic and noncatalytic wall boundary conditions.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical method is validated by flight data of the ELECTRE vehicle [12,21] and test measurement data in the arc-heated wind tunnel [22]. The ELECTRE vehicle is a sphero-conical configuration with an overall length of 2 m, cone half-angle of 4.6 degrees, and nose radius of 0.175 m. One trajectory point is chosen with the free stream condition of altitude 53.3 km and Mach number 13 [21]. The fixed wall temperature of 343 K is assumed for the fully catalytic and noncatalytic wall boundary conditions.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of the numerical method is validated for flight conditions, because of an error of 10% to 15% in the computation originating from the uncertainties in free stream conditions, thermocouple signal, etc. [21]. The blunt test model is chosen to validate the numerical method, with a nose radius of 0.15 m, a shoulder radius of 0.005 m, an overall radius of 0.12 m, and a length of 0.08 m; its cross-section is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure Effect of high temperature real gas aerodynamic characteristics [120] , (a) Coefficient of axial force, (b) Coefficient of normal force, (c) Coefficient of pitch moment 高温真实气体效应的风洞试验研究需要依靠高 焓试验装置,是高温气体效应研究的主要手段。目前 高焓风洞主要面临三个问题 [1,121] :一是高超声速飞行 条件下的气流总温难以复现;二是化学反应的进程 不随模型缩比发生变化,而纯净的空气来流和足够 大的试验段尺寸在高焓风洞实现原理和工程实现上 难以达到;三是气流速度难以复现。同时高焓流动实 验中的高温、高速气流对实验装置的损坏较大,非接 触式测量在测量精度等方面有待提高,这些因素都 限制了高温气体效应风洞试验研究。国内外建成了许 多高焓风洞,如中国科学院力学所的 JF12 [122] 爆轰驱 动激波风洞、美国加州理工大学的 T5 自由活塞驱动 激波风洞 [123] 和美国 LENS 系列加热轻气体驱动激波 风洞 [124] 等,并在高温真实气体效应研究方面取得了 一系列成果。飞行试验相比风洞试验能够完全反映出 真实物理环境的影响,但其能够获取的数据有限, 难以进行机理性研究工作。如 NASA 的无线电衰减测 量(RAM)项目 [125] 测试了空气的电离特性和减轻无 线电干扰的技术,得到了飞行器附近电子数密度分 布。欧洲空间局(ESA)的试验飞行器 ELECTRE [126] 记录了再入过程中的气动力/热数据。 数值模拟方法不…”
Section: 向力系数,(B)法向力系数,(c)俯仰力矩系数unclassified
“…To validate the numerical solver, a case from the experimental investigation by Muylaert et al (1992) is selected. In the experiment, the surface heat flux referred to as ELECTRE was measured.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Heating Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%