2018
DOI: 10.5740/jaoacint.smpr2018.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard Method Performance Requirements (SMPRs®) 2018.003: Quantitation of Milk by ELISA-Based Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RSD r and RSD R values of ≤20 and ≤30%, respectively, have been put forth as acceptable method performance criteria for allergen detection methods. However, there are no guidelines on what to expect from the analysis of complex matrices, such as fermented–hydrolyzed foods, using a competitive ELISA format, as studies on this topic are scarce. The average RSD r value of 17–35% and the average RSD R value of 30–41%, obtained in this study for the yogurt samples (S3) are slightly higher than performance criteria requirements mentioned above and consistent with what was observed previously by analyzing fermented–hydrolyzed food matrices by a commercially available competitive ELISA. , It can therefore be concluded that the multiplex-competitive ELISA is sufficiently reliable and has good analytical reproducibility both within laboratories and between laboratories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSD r and RSD R values of ≤20 and ≤30%, respectively, have been put forth as acceptable method performance criteria for allergen detection methods. However, there are no guidelines on what to expect from the analysis of complex matrices, such as fermented–hydrolyzed foods, using a competitive ELISA format, as studies on this topic are scarce. The average RSD r value of 17–35% and the average RSD R value of 30–41%, obtained in this study for the yogurt samples (S3) are slightly higher than performance criteria requirements mentioned above and consistent with what was observed previously by analyzing fermented–hydrolyzed food matrices by a commercially available competitive ELISA. , It can therefore be concluded that the multiplex-competitive ELISA is sufficiently reliable and has good analytical reproducibility both within laboratories and between laboratories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%