2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01562-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard metadata for 3D microscopy

Abstract: Recent advances in fluorescence microscopy techniques and tissue clearing, labeling, and staining provide unprecedented opportunities to investigate brain structure and function. These experiments’ images make it possible to catalog brain cell types and define their location, morphology, and connectivity in a native context, leading to a better understanding of normal development and disease etiology. Consistent annotation of metadata is needed to provide the context necessary to understand, reuse, and integra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of the WG was to establish standards to promote data sharing within the research community. The WG prioritized two approaches for developing standards: (1) to develop standard metadata, which has been described elsewhere (41); and (2) to investigate the feasibility of recommending standard protocols for tissue expansion microscopy. Because of the rapidly evolving nature of the field, the WG agreed that it was premature to recommend one or even a group of tissue-clearing protocols for use by all investigators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the WG was to establish standards to promote data sharing within the research community. The WG prioritized two approaches for developing standards: (1) to develop standard metadata, which has been described elsewhere (41); and (2) to investigate the feasibility of recommending standard protocols for tissue expansion microscopy. Because of the rapidly evolving nature of the field, the WG agreed that it was premature to recommend one or even a group of tissue-clearing protocols for use by all investigators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BIL initially started with a simple metadata model that included ∼14 flexible fields for broad descriptions of the datasets. In 2021, BIL transitioned from this initial model to the 3D Microscopy Metadata Standards (3D-MMS) developed through a BRAIN Initiative standardization project 19 . The standard is in the process of being adopted by the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF) 20 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these resources are or were smaller in scale, limited in the size of the imagery they could accept, are based internationally, or may include images for many different fields and are not specifically tailored for neuroscience. developed through a BRAIN Initiative standardization project 19 . The standard is in the process of being adopted by the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF) 20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While BIL does not limit the amount of data deposited per dataset or investigator, users planning to deposit more than 50TB of data in a single year should contact in advance to discuss data deposition plans. Data contributed to BIL following the Standard metadata for 3D microscopy schema (Ropelewski et al 2022) are issued DOIs. Higher-level traced neuron data is accepted in the SWC format (“NeuroMorpho.Org - a Centrally Curated Inventory of Digitally Reconstructed Neurons and Glia” n.d.).…”
Section: Data Archives For the Biccnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional standards were adopted over the course of the project as they became available, e.g., the Essential Metadata for 3D Microscopy standard developed with support from the BRAIN Initiative (Ropelewski et al 2022) was recently implemented by BIL. The independent data generation within the BICCN allowed post-hoc assessment of standards for rigor and reproducibility via meta-analysis.…”
Section: Standards and The Biccn: Towards Fair Neurosciencementioning
confidence: 99%