Experimental Psychology 1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-7241-7_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard error of the difference between means

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where q is a constant specifying the width of the CFL (1.96, 2.58, and 3.29, for 95, 99, and 99.9%, respectively) and SE 1 and SE 2 are the predicted standard errors for the points on the two surface 66,67 . In cases where outcomes were transformed, or modeled using a link function, CFLs were constricted on the latent scale, before overall surfaces were back transformed for interpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where q is a constant specifying the width of the CFL (1.96, 2.58, and 3.29, for 95, 99, and 99.9%, respectively) and SE 1 and SE 2 are the predicted standard errors for the points on the two surface 66,67 . In cases where outcomes were transformed, or modeled using a link function, CFLs were constricted on the latent scale, before overall surfaces were back transformed for interpretation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses were performed using Stata ® software (StataCorp, version 14) through the "metan" command, which requires two input parameters, effect estimate and standard error. In case the standard deviation was reported for the effect estimate, it was transformed into standard error according to formulas presented in Burns et al [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional analysis of subgroups was performed in patients with AS and impaired LV function. Mean differences of hemodynamic parameters between rest and stress and respective standard errors of the difference between means were calculated (40). Differences between baseline characteristics of study arms grouped according to stress type were checked by Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction where appropriate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%