Standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: protocol for a systematic review

Abstract

IntroductionRheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a preventable and treatable chronic condition which persists in many developing countries largely affecting impoverished populations. Handheld echocardiography presents an opportunity to address the need for more cost-effective methods of diagnosing RHD in developing countries, where the disease continues to carry high rates of morbidity and mortality. Preliminary studies have demonstrated moderate sensitivity as well as high specificity and diagnostic odds for detecting RHD in asymptomatic patients. We describe a protocol for a systematic review on the diagnostic performance of handheld echocardiography compared to standard echocardiography using the 2012 World Heart Federation criteria for diagnosing subclinical RHD.Methods and analysisElectronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and EBSCOhost as well as reference lists and citations of relevant articles will be searched from 2012 to date using a predefined strategy incorporating a combination of Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords. The methodological validity and quality of studies deemed eligible for inclusion will be assessed against review specific Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 criteria and information on metrics of diagnostic accuracy and demographics extracted. Forest plots of sensitivity and specificity as well as scatter plots in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space will be used to investigate heterogeneity. If possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted to produce summary results of sensitivity and specificity using the Hierarchical Summary ROC method. In addition, a sensitivity analysis will be conducted to investigate the effect of studies with a high risk of bias.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this systematic review of previously published literature. The planned review will provide a summary of the diagnostic accuracy of handheld echocardiography. Results may feed into evidence-based guidelines and should the findings of this review warrant a change in clinical practice, a summary report will be disseminated among leading clinicians and healthcare professionals in the field.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016051261.

Tecnologias utilizadas em cuidados críticos no combate a Covid-19: Revisão de escopo

“…O ecocardiograma portátil ao ser comparado com o ecocardiograma padrão (Telford et al, 2018) representa um método diagnóstico seguro, não invasivo e passível de ser implementado em ambientes remotos e com recursos limitados.…”

Standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy

“… 12 The protocol for this review is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42016051261 and has been published in BMJ Open . 13 …”

Smartphone interfaced handheld echocardiography for focused assessment of ventricular function and structure in children: A pilot study

“…These machines provided 2-dimensional (2D) imaging but lacked color and spectral Doppler and ECG synchronization. 2,[9][10][11] Some of the 3rd generation HHE machines are equipped to provide adequate 2-D imaging, M-mode, color flow Doppler, and basic measurement. 2 The advent of these relatively cheaper and user-friendly miniaturized ultrasound scanners has improved overall enthusiasm for point-of-care echocardiography.…”

“…3 While the standard transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) remains the ideal platform for evaluating detailed cardiac structure and function 4,5 the portability and relative cost-effectiveness of handheld echocardiogram (HHE) machines 6-8 make them suitable for resource-limited settings and underserved areas. 2, [9][10][11] Some of the 3rd generation HHE machines are equipped to provide adequate 2-D imaging, M-mode, color flow Doppler, and basic measurement. These machines can export images to a digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) platform for possible quantitative analysis, 2 although they lack the full capabilities of a standard machine, such as spectral Doppler imaging, ECG synchronization, tissue Doppler imaging, and 3-D imaging.…”