1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03690-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stand structure and dynamics of young red alder as affected by planting density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Spacing and carbon sequestration in Pinus brutia plantations loss due to evaporation caused by wind, resulting in less water content of the soil, which leads to growth retardation in trees especially in hot summer days (Kerr, 2003;Harrington et al, 2009 Knowe & Hibbs (1996) for young red alder (Alnus rubra Bong) and by Kerr (2003) for ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.), and with other similar researches.…”
Section: Height Growthmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Spacing and carbon sequestration in Pinus brutia plantations loss due to evaporation caused by wind, resulting in less water content of the soil, which leads to growth retardation in trees especially in hot summer days (Kerr, 2003;Harrington et al, 2009 Knowe & Hibbs (1996) for young red alder (Alnus rubra Bong) and by Kerr (2003) for ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.), and with other similar researches.…”
Section: Height Growthmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Seidel 1984;Lanner 1985). However, a few studies show that height growth increases with increasing density in young plantations (Gilbert et al 1995;Knowe and Hibbs 1996;Ritchie 1997). In addition, some researchers reported that height growth in intermediate densities was greater than in the high and the low densities (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Nelder design was developed to analyze the impact of a continuous range of densities on the yield of agricultural crops over a smaller area than traditional designs in order to minimize differences in yield related to variability within a site. Researchers have utilized this design in forestry primarily to examine growth and yield for a variety of species (e.g., Smith, 1978;Cole and Newton, 1986;Knowe and Hibbs, 1996;Hummel, 2000;Mabvurira and Miina, 2002;Kerr, 2003). For our plots, moving outward, there was an increase of 30% in space (area) per tree from one arc to the next, and 14% in distance between trees.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Tree Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%