2019
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2019-0188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stand growth responses after fertilization for thinned lodgepole pine, Douglas-fir, and spruce in forests of interior British Columbia, Canada

Abstract: This study was conducted to quantify growth responses of three major commercial conifer species (lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas ex Loudon var. latifolia Engelm. ex S. Watson), interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco), and spruce (white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) and hybrid spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex. Engelm. × Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière))) to various fertilizer blends in interior British Columbia, Canad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is similar to studies that report infrequent negative responders and non-responders [11,[42][43][44]. After the peak response two years after application, annual growth response decreased gradually in a non-linear fashion (Figure 3), consistent with the previous observation and modelled responses to N application [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is similar to studies that report infrequent negative responders and non-responders [11,[42][43][44]. After the peak response two years after application, annual growth response decreased gradually in a non-linear fashion (Figure 3), consistent with the previous observation and modelled responses to N application [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The response was greatest in years 2 and 3 after application, peaking at 34% three years after application. The index then rapidly decreased, consistent with modelled responses to N application [10]. The ten-year average value of I r from this analysis was 16.0%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations