2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-007-9043-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stand Density Control Diagrams for Scots pine and Austrian black pine plantations in Bulgaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the advent of the structural SDMD which incorporates a diameter distribution sub-model has been useful in solving a broad array of forest management problems (e.g., designing thinning prescriptions, evaluating wildlife habitat potential, estimating carbon storage potential, assessing the attainment of biologic diversity objectives (Newton et al , 2005Newton 2009)). The present investigation on the diameter structure of Austrian black pine plantations in Bulgaria was preceded by elaboration of a dynamic SDMD (Stankova and Shibuya 2007), which was further verified and proven to be better than the whole stand yield tables (Stankova and Zlatanov 2007). Thus, the incorporation of the diameter distribution model into the framework of the SDMD would significantly improve its modeling applicability by not only characterizing the present, but also by predicting the future horizontal structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, the advent of the structural SDMD which incorporates a diameter distribution sub-model has been useful in solving a broad array of forest management problems (e.g., designing thinning prescriptions, evaluating wildlife habitat potential, estimating carbon storage potential, assessing the attainment of biologic diversity objectives (Newton et al , 2005Newton 2009)). The present investigation on the diameter structure of Austrian black pine plantations in Bulgaria was preceded by elaboration of a dynamic SDMD (Stankova and Shibuya 2007), which was further verified and proven to be better than the whole stand yield tables (Stankova and Zlatanov 2007). Thus, the incorporation of the diameter distribution model into the framework of the SDMD would significantly improve its modeling applicability by not only characterizing the present, but also by predicting the future horizontal structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…These data were available from the current and the archived forest management plans of the local forest management units. The plot dominant height was estimated from the experimental mean plot height by the relationship established by Stankova et al (2006). Data obtained before and after the thinning of the treated plots were considered as distinct time series thus yielding 98 data series from 79 plots.…”
Section: Data Set and Data Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data records for Scots pine plantations were obtained from permanent sample plots (of size 150-2000 m 2 , measured 2-4 times since the 1970s) used to develop growth and yield tables for Scots pine plantations (Krastanov et al 1980), experimental plots in Scots pine plantations against erosion (Marinov 2008) and permanent sample plots established for inventory purposes. We estimated the plot dominant height of this data set from the experimental mean plot height, using a previously established linear relationship (Stankova et al 2006).…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%