2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stand characteristics and dead wood in urban forests: Potential biodiversity hotspots in managed boreal landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A likely reason for this is the more homogeneous forest management practices, or merely the lack of them, as the Kuhmo area forms an ecologically important region, where only 33% of field plots were normally managed, 57% strictly conserved, and 10% conserved with an unknown degree of conservation. A similar phenomenon can also be found in other forest areas with softer management practices such as urban forests [13]. There were no exceptional field plots that would have stood out from others in Kuhmo, either.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A likely reason for this is the more homogeneous forest management practices, or merely the lack of them, as the Kuhmo area forms an ecologically important region, where only 33% of field plots were normally managed, 57% strictly conserved, and 10% conserved with an unknown degree of conservation. A similar phenomenon can also be found in other forest areas with softer management practices such as urban forests [13]. There were no exceptional field plots that would have stood out from others in Kuhmo, either.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A significant difference between managed and natural forests is dead wood volume. The mean dead wood volume in Finnish forest areas is 5.8 m 3 per hectare, varying from managed forests with less than 2 m 3 per hectare [7] to forests with softer management practices, e.g., urban forests (median 10.1 m 3 per hectare [13]), and finally to natural forests that host a volumes between 40 and 170 m 3 per hectare [14]. What follows is that the dead wood continuum does not exist either [3,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Moth site is located in a city, and the Beech forest is in large parts a protected area rich in species, while the Pollinator site(s) are agricultural sites embedded in a matrix of species poor production forest (mainly spruce monocultures). Urban forests and protected forests have been found to be more diverse than production forests (Korhonen et al 2020) although a recent study from Finland found that fungal diversity in the air declined steeply with urbanization (Abrego et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Moth site is located in a city, and the Beech forest is in large parts a protected area rich in species, while the Pollinator site(s) are agricultural sites embedded in a matrix of species poor production forest (mainly spruce monocultures). Urban forests and protected forests have been found to be more diverse than production forests (Korhonen et al 2020) although a recent study from Finland found that fungal diversity in the air declined steeply with urbanization (Abrego et al 2020). Putting the Beech forest aside (where the pattern is difficult to assess), other explanations could also play a role: The sampling at the Moths side was conducted in the mornings, and the weather during the sampling period was variable (with some calmer and some windier days, and quite a few days with cloud cover), while the weather conditions during the sampling at the Pollinator site were windstill and sunny.…”
Section: Origin and Fate Of Airborne Ednamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we hypothesise that abundant fungal communities typical in the soils of conifer-dominated forests will decompose recalcitrant litter (wood sticks) faster than in urban habitat types without trees. Remnant coniferdominated forest patches in urban areas are also expected to decompose recalcitant litter faster, since these urban forests contain dead and decaying wood but at lower volumes (Maene 2005;Korhonen et al 2020), unless disturbance impairs their soil fungal community (see Epp Schmidt et al 2017). Wood decomposition in park and ruderal sites is expected to be slow due to a lack of woody material, which will create a depauperate saproxylic microbial community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%