2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stance-In-Depth Deep Neural Approach to Stance Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…from the textual data. It is identified through understanding the similarity of the headline and body of news content or article [22]. Common approaches involve training a labeled dataset with their stances, but a challenging task in this area includes stance detection without having the target values or no training data.…”
Section: Stance Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from the textual data. It is identified through understanding the similarity of the headline and body of news content or article [22]. Common approaches involve training a labeled dataset with their stances, but a challenging task in this area includes stance detection without having the target values or no training data.…”
Section: Stance Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the continuous attempt to limit the number of handcrafted features and corpus-specific knowledge, research has mainly shifted towards Deep Learning. The most common architecture is bidirectional Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) Neural Networks fed with word embeddings [23,24,7]. In general, Deep Learning frameworks tend to give state-of-the-art results, which approach human performance.…”
Section: Related Work On Argument Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajendran et al compared and discussed the performance of LSTM and GRU in stance detection whose categories are 'Agree', 'Discuss', 'Disagree', and 'Unrelated'. They found that bidirectional LSTM performed best [24]. Sobhani et al proposed an attentionbased encoder-decoder framework that shows better results than other methods in multi-target stance detection [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%