2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STAN in clinical practice—The outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Gothenburg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous published rates of neonatal metabolic acidosis seen in association with intrapartum fetal ST analysis used in clinical practice (0.45-2.8%) (Doria et al 2007;Massoud et al 2007;Norén et al 2006). Norén et al (2006) demonstrated that increased use of STAN over time was associated with a reduction in the number of cases with neonatal metabolic acidosis. The authors suggested that this reduction in neonatal metabolic acidosis might be due to increased familiarity with STAN guidelines and the improved response times to ST events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with previous published rates of neonatal metabolic acidosis seen in association with intrapartum fetal ST analysis used in clinical practice (0.45-2.8%) (Doria et al 2007;Massoud et al 2007;Norén et al 2006). Norén et al (2006) demonstrated that increased use of STAN over time was associated with a reduction in the number of cases with neonatal metabolic acidosis. The authors suggested that this reduction in neonatal metabolic acidosis might be due to increased familiarity with STAN guidelines and the improved response times to ST events.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…STAN has been shown to reduce the number of operative deliveries for fetal distress (Kale et al 2008), reduce the need for FBS (Vayssière et al 2007) and also reduce the incidence of neonatal metabolic acidosis in a clinical setting (Norén et al 2006). Intra-partum fetal surveillance with STAN is also acceptable for patients (Parisaei et al 2009) and medical staff (Rault et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a series of 411 women monitored with STAN for fetal distress, we showed that the sensitivity of STAN to predict pH b 7.05 at birth is better than it predicting pH b 7.15 (63% and 38%, respectively) [5]. Our findings, like the Swedish results [9][10][11], are encouraging [5] in better screening for more severe acidosis. These recent results were not known when respondents completed the questionnaire in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…14 BDecf was calculated according to Wiberg et al 11 As part of the introduction of the new STAN methodology for intrapartum fetal surveillance, combining an automatic continuous evaluation of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) with conventional fetal heart rate analysis (carditocography [CTG]), a prospective observational study covering the total population of deliveries at term in the city of Gothenburg and surrounding areas was conducted over 2 years (October 2000 to September 2002). 12 Of the 14 687 term deliveries, 78 cases had cord artery metabolic acidosis (group A). Control cases (group B) were identified as the 2 adjacent deliveries monitored with the same technique CTG or CTG and ST analysis in combination, delivered at the same gestational age, of the same gender, having a cord artery pH of .7.10 and in whom there was no need of care in the neonatal ward.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%