2006
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staminal Evolution in the Genus Salvia (Lamiaceae): Molecular Phylogenetic Evidence for Multiple Origins of the Staminal Lever

Abstract: Based on these results the following are characterized: (1) the independent origin of the staminal lever mechanism on at least three different occasions in Salvia, (2) that Salvia is clearly polyphyletic, with five other genera intercalated within it, and (3) staminal evolution has proceeded in different ways in each of the three lineages of Salvia but has resulted in remarkably similar staminal morphologies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
315
1
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
24
315
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Walker & al. (2004) and Walker & Sytsma (2006) anlaysed phylogenetic relationships among 83 Salvia species, including S. sclarea but not S. tingitana. It is interesting to note that the relationships of their clades correlated well with chromosome numbers.…”
Section: Cytology and Chromosome Numbermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Walker & al. (2004) and Walker & Sytsma (2006) anlaysed phylogenetic relationships among 83 Salvia species, including S. sclarea but not S. tingitana. It is interesting to note that the relationships of their clades correlated well with chromosome numbers.…”
Section: Cytology and Chromosome Numbermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, the ILD test may be insensitive to localized differences in the evolutionary histories of two data sets if many or several other clades are strongly supported and congruent [22]. In addition, authors also considered that total evidence could generate a phylogenetic tree with greater resolution and higher support [31][32][33]. Notably, statistical approaches were rarely used to explain incongruence.…”
Section: Current Status Of Cpdna and Nrdna Data Analysis In Plant Phymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drew, Cacho & Sytsma]. These results suggest that Salviinae should consist of Lepechinia, Salvia (sensu Walker and Sytsma, 2007), and Melissa (Walker and Sytsma, 2007;Drew andSytsma, 2011, 2013), which was previously unplaced within Mentheae (Harley et al, 2004). Although there are no clear morphological synapomorphies that characterize Lepechinia, it can be distinguished from other members of Salviinae based on non-galeate upper corolla lips, an unenlarged connective separating the two thecae of the stamens (as opposed to most Salvia), non-mucilaginous mericarps, and a distinctive leaf odor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Lepechinia nelsonii was included because Drew (2011) showed this species was allied to L. flammea. Melissa officinalis L. was chosen as outgroup based on Walker and Sytsma (2007), and Drew andSytsma (2011, 2013). Our dataset consisted of three chloroplast (cpDNA; ycf1, ycf1-rps15 spacer, and the trnL-F spacer and intron) regions, the internal and external transcribed spacers (ITS and ETS, respectively), and two lowcopy nuclear gene regions (granule-bound starch synthase I (GBSSI or waxy) and a pentatricopeptide repeat gene region (PPR-AT3G09060).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%