2017
DOI: 10.1080/15564886.2017.1377656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stalking on the College Campus: The Influence of Suitable Target and Guardianship Variables on Victimization Comparing Male and Female Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that target congruence can effectively identify factors that place individuals at risk for stalking victimization. Second, this study supports past research, concluding that lifestyleroutine activities theory is a useful perspective for understanding stalking against college students (Fisher et al, 2002;Mustaine & Tewksbury, 1999;Reyns et al, 2011;Reyns & Scherer, 2017;Wood & Stichman, 2018). We found significant results for two of the four concepts of lifestyle-routine activities theory: exposure to motivated offenders and proximity to motivated offenders.…”
Section: Discussion Discussion Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that target congruence can effectively identify factors that place individuals at risk for stalking victimization. Second, this study supports past research, concluding that lifestyleroutine activities theory is a useful perspective for understanding stalking against college students (Fisher et al, 2002;Mustaine & Tewksbury, 1999;Reyns et al, 2011;Reyns & Scherer, 2017;Wood & Stichman, 2018). We found significant results for two of the four concepts of lifestyle-routine activities theory: exposure to motivated offenders and proximity to motivated offenders.…”
Section: Discussion Discussion Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The results of these analyses showed that some of the opportunity-based measures of victimization were gender-dependent (e.g., using instant messaging), whereas others were gender-neutral (e.g., giving strangers access to online social networks). Finally, Wood and Stichman (2018) examined target suitability and guardianship as they relate to stalking victimization while accounting for gender among 873 college students at a single university. The authors found that only variables measuring target suitability (e.g., sexual history) were significant for both males and females.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings somewhat mirrored those reported in Chan and Sheridan's [2] sample of Hong Kong young adults whereby males were significantly more likely than females to experience having the perpetrator contact their friends/family to learn about their whereabouts and make unsolicited phone calls to them at least once in their lifetime (i.e., courtship and information seeking). However, Wood and Stichman [29] found the opposite to be true where their US based female participants were more likely to experience surveillance and approach types of stalking and intrusive behaviors than were male participants. More cross-cultural empirical work is required to further examine the gender relationship in stalking victimization, especially if cultural norms and values play a vital role in these differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Differences have been found in the types of stalking behaviors engaged in by male and female stalkers. For example, Wood and Stichman [29] found that their sample of female university students were more likely than their male counterparts to report experience of the following stalking behaviors: being spied upon; receiving unsolicited phone calls and text messages; seeing the stalker lurking outside their home, school, or workplace; and seeing the stalker in places they should not be. Males were more likely to experience having the stalker vandalize their property or destroying something they loved.…”
Section: Gender and Stalkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, previous studies find LGB individuals are at risk for victimization (Walters et al, 2013) and are more likely to be blamed for their assaults (White & Yamawaki, 2009). Lastly, sexual history may influence an individual’s perceived vulnerability (Wood & Stichman, 2018). Studies point to sexual history as a victimization risk factor (Fisher et al, 2002; Siddique, 2016).…”
Section: Theorizing Routine Activities In the Context Of Campus Sexual Victimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%