2019
DOI: 10.3390/soc9030051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholders’ Views on Responsible Assessments of Assistive Technologies through an Ethical HTA Matrix

Abstract: Assessments of novel assistive technologies for use in home-based services has been documented to be performed in a variety of ways and often with a rather narrow focus on safety and effect or effectiveness. In order better to understand the place for wider forms of assessments of assistive technologies, the current study presents a combination of the Ethical Matrix and the Socratic approach for assessment of health technologies—the Ethical HTA Matrix. This matrix was filled with content based on a case of a G… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more information about the design of the project and results, see also Zouganeli et al2017 [ 34 ]. Holthe et al [ 16 , 35 , 36 ], Casagrande [ 7 ], Holthe [ 12 ] and Thorstensen [ 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more information about the design of the project and results, see also Zouganeli et al2017 [ 34 ]. Holthe et al [ 16 , 35 , 36 ], Casagrande [ 7 ], Holthe [ 12 ] and Thorstensen [ 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much attention has been payed to question as to what are the most useful and promising solutions [1,2]; how to successfully deploy novel technologies [3]; and different perspectives on the ideals of active ageing and ageing at home [4]. However, the underlying values for the selection of useful and promising technologies and their relations to the ideals of the good life seems still to be an area where a tacit consensus reigns [5]. Dimensions of the good life is central to assessing the value of assistive technologies [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%