Stakeholders’ experiences of what works in planning and implementing environmental interventions to promote active travel: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis

Abstract

Infrastructure for active travel (AT) is receiving attention as a lowcost, sustainable transport option that promotes physical activity. However, the planning and implementation of new AT infrastructure often brings challenges. This review synthesises stakeholders' views and experiences of developing guidance for, designing, commissioning and implementing environmental interventions to promote AT. Eight databases were searched for studies containing qualitative data from stakeholders with direct experience. Results were synthesised thematically. The risk of bias was assessed using the CASP checklist for qualitative research, and evidence quality using the GRADE-CERQual tool. A total of 21,703 articles were identified from database searches, with 35 studies included. Eighteen studies focused on infrastructure promoting walking and cycling, fourteen on cycling and three on walking. Fifteen studies were judged to have no/very minor concerns, 12 had minor concerns, four had moderate concerns and four were of serious concern. A variety of stakeholders were influential, most commonly supportive elected leaders and individuals in public and voluntary sectors. Inter-disciplinary collaboration facilitated sharing of expertise and resources, and upskilling was beneficial. Effective communication methods varied between stakeholders and reason for communication. Persuasive strategies included aligning with stakeholders priorities and making the best use of evidence. Opportune moments to implement AT infrastructure were alongside non-AT ARTICLE HISTORY

Active travel infrastructure design and implementation: Insights from behavioral science

“…Planning of new active travel schemes needs to begin with early communication undertaken within an open and fair consultation (Lawlor et al, 2022). Ideally, messages should aim to challenge status quo bias and would aim to help local citizens to make up their minds about the benefits and disadvantages of change based on accurate perceptions and expectations.…”

“…This issue may be particularly relevant for active travel initiatives, as they are often viewed as the pet projects of faceless and unaccountable technocrats (Selmoune et al, 2020). One systematic review of factors that affect the successful implementation of infrastructural change highlighted the importance of influential individuals and their communication strategies with the public (Lawlor et al, 2022). Planners of such projects could thus benefit from collaboration and involvement of individuals or community groups to build public trust.…”

Using Behavioural Science to Design and Implement Active Travel Infrastructure: A Narrative Review of Evidence

“…Planning of new active travel schemes needs to begin with early communication undertaken within an open and fair consultation (see Lawlor et al, 2022). Ideally, messages would be designed to challenge status quo bias and would aim to help local citizens to make up their minds about the benefits, or otherwise, of change based on accurate perceptions and expectations.…”