Stakeholder Visions for Biodiversity Conservation in Developing Countries

Abstract

Abstract:The 2014 Conference of the Parties (COP 12) for the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) was another step on the road to achieving the Aichi Targets the CBD agreed in 2010. It was also a key step on the way to making progress towards the vision of a more balanced relationship between people and the rest of biodiversity by 2050. Many key issues were left for this COP by negotiators from COP 11 and earlier meetings; such as settling financial issues, articulating clearly the Aichi Targets for national implementation by 2020, or providing clear guidance on capacity-building for developing states. This paper utilizes 22 stakeholder interviews taken at the 2012 Hyderabad COP to develop discussion of ongoing issues in the CBD negotiations. These interviews yielded a number of tractable policy opportunities available for the 2014 Conference to create significant space for developing countries to contribute effectively to global achievement of the Aichi Targets. Breakthroughs and developments at the COP, despite the inevitability of some difficult discussions, will be provided by developing country perspectives. Despite that potential traction, Ministers at the high-level segment noted that progress towards the Aichi targets is insufficient and recognizing there was still much to do on resource mobilization, reaffirmed their commitment to mobilize financial resources from all sources for the effective implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. As we enter the second half of the 2011-2020 decade, developing countries must be placed at the center of efforts to improve sustainable use, conservation and benefit sharing of biodiversity around the world. OPEN ACCESSSustainability 2015, 7 272

Building local support for a coastal protected area: Collaborative governance in the Bigi Pan Multiple Use Management Area of Suriname

“…The success of marine protected areas strongly depends on the human dimensions and social aspects of nature conservation management [1]. These human dimensions include the presence of strong community leadership [2,3], local support for conservation [4], and conflict management and resolution [1]. In the past, protected areas were often created without the involvement of local communities and user groups [5] and "conservation of biodiversity was mainly sought by establishing protected areas through an exclusive, top-down, government-led process" [6]; p1).…”

“…In the past, protected areas were often created without the involvement of local communities and user groups [5] and "conservation of biodiversity was mainly sought by establishing protected areas through an exclusive, top-down, government-led process" [6]; p1). Today, the inclusion of local communities in conservation approaches is increasingly promoted to attain more sustainable policies and a more effective and continued policy implementation [2,3].…”

The role of landscape in the formation of the Absheron reserves

“…Its founder was Schlüter (1928), who managed to unite the chorological ideas of Hettner and the French anthropocentric human geography (Adenle et al, 2014;UNESCO, 1972). Since then, developed countries pay close attention to studying and designing cultural landscapes (Iwamura et al, 2014;Young, 1992).…”

Performance comparison of two reduced-representation based genome-wide marker-discovery strategies in a multi-taxon phylogeographic framework

“…1 B). Institutions and scientists based in economically disadvantaged regions will be pivotal in dealing with the biodiversity crisis 35 – 37 . In this context, phylogeography, a discipline that is essential in defining conservation-relevant evolutionary entities and in addressing the taxonomic impediment, will be key 38 – 40 .…”