Stakeholder views on the acceptability of human infection studies in Malawi

Abstract

Background: Human infection studies (HIS) are valuable in vaccine development. Deliberate infection, however, creates challenging questions, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) where HIS are new and ethical challenges may be heightened. Consultation with stakeholders is needed to support contextually appropriate and acceptable study design. We examined stakeholder perceptions about the acceptability and ethics of HIS in Malawi, to inform decisions about planned pneumococcal challenge research and wider understanding of HIS ethics in LMICs. Methods: We conducted 6 deliberative focus groups and 15 follow-up interviews with research staff, medical students, and community representatives from rural and urban Blantyre. We also conducted 5 key informant interviews with clinicians, ethics committee members, and district health government officials. Results: Stakeholders perceived HIS research to have potential population health benefits, but they also had concerns, particularly related to the safety of volunteers and negative community reactions. Acceptability depended on a range of conditions related to procedures for voluntary and informed consent, inclusion criteria, medical care or support, compensation, regulation, and robust community engagement. These conditions largely mirror those in existing guidelines for HIS and biomedical research in LMICs. Stakeholder perceptions pointed to potential tensions, for example, balancing equity, safety, and relevance in inclusion criteria. Conclusions: Our findings suggest HIS research could be acceptable in Malawi, provided certain conditions are in place. Ongoing assessment of participant experiences and stakeholder perceptions will be required to strengthen HIS research during development and roll-out.

A clinical study to optimise a sand fly biting protocol for use in a controlled human infection model of cutaneous leishmaniasis (the FLYBITE study)

“…With increasing descriptions of new CHIM studies being mooted, so too the need for robust frameworks to ensure appropriate engagement is strengthened. This is especially true of CHIMs for development in LMICs 94 . The bioethical discussion surrounding such studies has included the utility and practicality of public involvement and engagement within a rapidly changing landscape 27,95 .…”

Understanding the benefits and burdens associated with a Malaria Human Infection Study in Kenya: Experiences of study volunteers and other stakeholders

“…In these settings, prior exposure may be associated with less severe symptoms and the illness seen as an 'everyday occurrence' (5,6). Since HIS can help to address global burdens of vaccine-preventable diseases, their conduct in countries that carry the highest burden of these conditions is potentially important (3,7,8).…”

Stakeholder engagement in the health policy process in a low income country: a qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions of the challenges to effective inclusion in Malawi

“…The hierarchy of engagement was likely to diminish their contributions as less accurate or useful than other forms of evidence used in the decision-making process (9,25). Two way communication between the government and stakeholders throughout the policy development process is essential for building trust and social accountability (26,27). This should include feedback mechanisms at the implementation stage so stakeholders, especially CSOs and facilities can identify where the policy is not meeting the population needs (2).…”