Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance

Abstract

We examine the effect of a firm's relations with its nonfinancial stakeholders, including its employees, suppliers, customers, and communities, on the persistence of both superior and inferior financial performance. In particular, integrating and extending the resource‐based view of the firm and stakeholder management literatures, we develop the arguments that good stakeholder relations not only enable a firm with superior financial performance to sustain its competitive advantage for a longer period of time, but more importantly, also help poorly performing firms to recover from disadvantageous positions more quickly. The arguments are supported by the analysis of a series of first‐order autoregressive models. Our findings further suggest that the positive effect of good stakeholder relations on the persistence of superior performance is not as strong as that of some other firm resources, such as technological knowledge, but it is the only factor examined that promises to help a firm recover from inferior performance. Therefore, the role of positive stakeholder relations in helping poorly performing firms recover is found to be more critical than its role in helping superior firms sustain their performance advantage. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Unraveling the effects of environmental outcomes and processes on financial performance: A non-linear approach

“…Debt/equity ratio was included as a proxy of the firm's riskiness, which could influence its market value (Choi and Wang, 2009). Riskiness is commonly used as a control in research on Tobin's q (Lu and Beamish, 2004).…”

Supplier Development for Sustainability: Contextual Barriers in Global Supply Chains

“…The impact and the support of buyers via inter-organizational collaboration and learning are critical antecedents to the successful adoption of sustainability-related practices among suppliers (Choi and Wang, 2009). Middle managers in purchasing often stimulate SDS (Ehrgott et al, 2013), and internal resources and capabilities represent additional determinants of successful SDS (Sancha et al, 2015).…”

Stakeholder marketing: theoretical foundations and required capabilities

“…Stakeholder marketing capabilities are unlikely to have a short-term and direct effect on traditional performance measures, such as profits, sales, or market share. Instead, based on literature on stakeholder relations (Maignan and Ferrell 2004;Bosse et al 2009;Choi and Wang 2009;Surroca et al 2010), we expect their impact to be long-term and indirect. More specifically, stakeholder marketing capabilities are likely to lead to strong stakeholder relationships.…”

“…Also, such firms are likely to be better at involving stakeholders, which stimulates the stakeholders' identification with the firm. Stakeholder relationships constitute a source of competitive advantage (Surroca et al 2010) that not only generate financial rents but also protect the firm against hostility (such as product harm crises) and contribute to firm survival (Choi and Wang 2009). More specifically, strong stakeholder relationships reflect the willingness of stakeholders to support the firm with their resources (Maignan and Ferrell 2004).…”