Stakeholder Pressure Engaged with Circular Economy Principles and Economic and Environmental Performance

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the impacts of internal and external stakeholder pressures on the adoption of circular economy (CE) principles. The study explores the primary barriers to and causes (external or internal stakeholder pressures) of CE’s transition across Mexico and explores the effects of stakeholder pressures (internal and external) on the adoption of CE principles on economic and environmental performance. For this, data were collected from 433 respondents using a structured questionnaire. For analysis, the study used the PLS-SEM technique to examine internal and external stakeholders as barriers and motivators of economic and environmental performance through CE principles. Both the structural model and the measurement model were assessed. As well as mediation analysis, the direct and indirect effects were determined. The study found that economic (β = 0.178, p = 0.000) and environmental performance (β = 0.233, p = 0.000) is affected by most external stakeholders through the adoption of circular economy principles. Although the internal stakeholders don’t affect the environmental performance (β = 0.040, p = 0.492), with the adoption of circular economy principles mediating the relationship, internal stakeholders encourage environmental performance (β = 0.201, p = 0.000). The study motivates the public, non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the government to adopt CE principles for the achievement of economic and environmental performance and participation in the sustainable development agenda.

An Experimental Portuguese Social-Enterprise Project in Urban Agriculture: A Case Study on the Influence of the Interaction of Stakeholder Roles on Sustainable Governance

“…Urban agriculture covers a diverse range of approaches, such as commercial farming, research and technology projects, through the recovery of unused space or buildings to create local food-production systems or community-directed gardens and/or educationally focused projects located in schools [2]. Many UA projects provide economic, social and environmental benefits with a myriad of actors, stakeholders, desires and goals of those involved intersecting during the life of projects [5]. Value attributed to the outcomes of UA projects is context specific, as it depends heavily on how the different groups and stakeholders involved conceive of and perceive different benefits based on assumptions about UA [6].…”