2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40795-021-00414-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder perspectives on the effectiveness of the Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership: a qualitative study

Abstract: Background Interventions to reduce population salt intake are feasible and cost-effective. The Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership implemented a complex, multi-faceted salt reduction intervention between 2014 and 2020 in the Australian state of Victoria. This study aimed to understand stakeholder perspectives on the effectiveness of the Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Partnership and foo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most prominent barriers affecting two or more implementation outcomes included: consumer level barriers (poor knowledge of excess salt intake and its impact on health, distrust in government-led work due to poor implementation of existing dietary policies, cultural practices on food preparation), organization barriers (poor design of nutrition labels, perceived loss of customers due to changing taste), and policy level determinants (lack of salt replacement, poor advertising regulation, high cost of public health campaigns, existence of multiple sources of salt, bureaucratic nature of public institutions, affordability of high-salt foods). These implementation barriers are similar to those identified in previous studies of national salt reduction programs [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The most prominent barriers affecting two or more implementation outcomes included: consumer level barriers (poor knowledge of excess salt intake and its impact on health, distrust in government-led work due to poor implementation of existing dietary policies, cultural practices on food preparation), organization barriers (poor design of nutrition labels, perceived loss of customers due to changing taste), and policy level determinants (lack of salt replacement, poor advertising regulation, high cost of public health campaigns, existence of multiple sources of salt, bureaucratic nature of public institutions, affordability of high-salt foods). These implementation barriers are similar to those identified in previous studies of national salt reduction programs [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This was the first salt awareness campaign to be implemented and evaluated within the Australian setting. Although our reported changes in KABs were modest; this is to be expected when considering outcomes achieved from previous health promotion awareness campaigns [ 45 , 46 , 50 , 51 ] and the relatively limited allocation of resources to the current campaign [ 21 ]. Internationally, one of the most notable consumer awareness campaigns targeting population salt reduction was conducted in the UK by the Food Standards Agency (FSA) between 2004 and 2009 [ 7 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The multi-faceted intervention was developed and overseen by the Victorian Salt Reduction Partnership, a group of stakeholders from health-related non-governmental organizations, the state government and the academic sector. Intervention strategies were informed by previous state and community-level salt-reduction interventions [ 18 , 19 ] and centered around five key action areas—raising consumer awareness; generating public debate; strategic partnership; engaging food industry; and advocacy and policy strengthening [ 20 , 21 ]. Central to the intervention was a consumer awareness campaign delivered during 2016–2019 [ 16 , 20 ] that aimed to support consumers in reducing their salt intake and encourage community support for reduced-salt foods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These stakeholders had similar experiences and perspectives and it is unlikely this grouping influenced the results. In addition, the recruitment approach, which was through the support service mailing list, was chosen due to previously faced challenges in contacting and engaging eligible participants within publicly funded institutions as part of a larger statewide salt reduction program [63]. However, our sample was likely biased towards organisations implementing or already complying with the guidelines, so perspectives may not be representative of all stakeholders in publicly funded institutions in Victoria.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%