2017
DOI: 10.1089/omi.2017.0047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder Perspectives on Public Health Genomics Applications for Sickle Cell Disease: A Methodology for a Human Heredity and Health in Africa (H3Africa) Qualitative Research Study

Abstract: Advances in omics technologies alone are not a guarantee that science will translate to robust responsible innovation that is firmly grounded in societal values. This study aimed to identify best practices for Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) research in Africa that allows for optimal integration of community perspectives into the design and implementation of genomics research. In a large sample of 346 stakeholders in Cameroon, Ghana, and Tanzania (59% women), we used a qualitative study design w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study was part of a larger empirical ethics study aiming to explore the perspectives of a broad range of community stakeholders regarding participation in genomics research on sickle cell disease (SCD) (Treadwell et al 2017). This was a cross-sectional study that used purposive sampling and qualitative research strategies to develop an in-depth understanding of cultural influences on perspectives on and attitudes towards genomic research and on perceptions about public health interventions for SCD-related complications in Cameroon, Ghana, and Tanzania (Treadwell et al 2017). For the current manuscript, we drew on indepth interviews and focus group discussions conducted in this larger project to explore data relating to decision-making for participation in genomics research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study was part of a larger empirical ethics study aiming to explore the perspectives of a broad range of community stakeholders regarding participation in genomics research on sickle cell disease (SCD) (Treadwell et al 2017). This was a cross-sectional study that used purposive sampling and qualitative research strategies to develop an in-depth understanding of cultural influences on perspectives on and attitudes towards genomic research and on perceptions about public health interventions for SCD-related complications in Cameroon, Ghana, and Tanzania (Treadwell et al 2017). For the current manuscript, we drew on indepth interviews and focus group discussions conducted in this larger project to explore data relating to decision-making for participation in genomics research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General limitations of the project as a whole have been discussed in a dedicated paper on the study methodology (Treadwell et al 2017). Specific to the present article, language could be a limitation, as translation in English was needed for some interviews from French in Cameroon, Twi in Ghana, and Swahili in Tanzania.…”
Section: Study Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. Details of the study’s methodology have been published elsewhere (Treadwell et al ) so will be reviewed only briefly.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research aims to inform policies and practices in relation to some aspects of genomic research and SCD public health interventions, within the context of religious institutions that are so central to everyday life. (Treadwell et al 2017) so will be reviewed only briefly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation