2018
DOI: 10.1080/10796126.2018.1518777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder perceptions of contextual factors related to PBIS implementation in high need schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, rural schools had significantly lower scores on the PBIS Team subscale, which includes only 3 items: “Team has administrative support,” “Team has regular meetings (at least monthly),” and “Team has established a clear mission/purpose.” There are several potential reasons for the difference when reviewing previous studies. In a study that looked at high needs schools, including rural schools, McDaniel et al (2018) identified five factors to consider when implementing in high needs schools, including SWPBIS Readiness (e.g., buy-in and foundational skills) and Stakeholder Support (e.g., parents, administrators, teachers, and community). The results suggest that technical assistance with rural schools should consider these two factors as a high priority.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, rural schools had significantly lower scores on the PBIS Team subscale, which includes only 3 items: “Team has administrative support,” “Team has regular meetings (at least monthly),” and “Team has established a clear mission/purpose.” There are several potential reasons for the difference when reviewing previous studies. In a study that looked at high needs schools, including rural schools, McDaniel et al (2018) identified five factors to consider when implementing in high needs schools, including SWPBIS Readiness (e.g., buy-in and foundational skills) and Stakeholder Support (e.g., parents, administrators, teachers, and community). The results suggest that technical assistance with rural schools should consider these two factors as a high priority.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we developed the 27-item EBD Pandemic Survey (McDaniel et al, 2020) to collect data regarding the services and supports school personnel in K–12 settings reported providing to students with EBD and the extent to which these personnel felt they were able to implement the IEP and address students’ social, emotional, and behavioral needs. The survey was developed collaboratively, drawing on the knowledge and experiences of the author team, all of whom have doctorates in special education and experience developing and conducting surveys (e.g., Bruhn et al, 2014; McDaniel et al, 2018; Walker et al, 2019), and practitioners responsible for providing and administering services for students with EBD during the pandemic. First, the authors met to conceptualize the broader purpose of the survey and generate potential items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our findings about PBIS fidelity and its impact on PBIS efficacy are important, these findings were presented for all of the schools in this sample. Given the suggestion in prior research questioning the effectiveness of PBIS in schools with large numbers of students from minoritized backgrounds (Baule & Superior, 2020;McDaniel et al, 2018;Nese et al, 2016), the current investigation should be replicated in future research examining the impact of student diversity on these findings.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 97%