Stakeholder integration in new product development: a systematic analysis of drivers and firm capabilities

Abstract

In this article, we develop a conceptual model of stakeholder integration in new product development (NPD) that (i) explains the drivers of the process and (ii) proposes a framework of capabilities that firms need for successful stakeholder integration. The focus lies on external stakeholders that directly influence the adoption of new products. We conduct a systematic literature review and content analyze a sample of 96 peer-reviewed journal articles. The study is restricted to the medical device industry to enable the use of specific search terms and the consistent categorization of information. We dedicate a section to showing how the framework applies to other settings. The drivers of stakeholder integration are classified into push factors (i.e., expected benefits for the focal firm) and pull factors (i.e., expected benefits for the stakeholders). This study provides an initial model of how stakeholder integration works based on its drivers. In addition, three related stakeholder integration capabilities emerge: stakeholder identification capability, stakeholder interaction capability and stakeholder input integration capability. The paper proposes a description of these capabilities for stakeholder integration in NPD and, thus, contributes to stakeholder theory and research on the management of NPD. The results open new paths for empirical testing and offer practical guidance on how to successfully integrate stakeholders in NPD processes.

How CEO social capital drives corporate social performance: The roles of stakeholders, and CEO tenure

“…Second, this paper contributes to the stakeholder literature (e.g., Freeman et al, 2010; Plaza‐Úbeda et al, 2010; Rueda‐Manzanares et al, 2008) by investing the role of CEO social ties in driving stakeholder integration capability of SMEs. Whiles previous studies have often discussed the outcomes of stakeholder integration such as innovation (Adomako, Amankwah‐Amoah, & Danso, 2019; Jonas et al, 2016), new product development (Vaquero Martín et al, 2016), corporate performance (Danso et al, 2019; Donaldson & Preston, 1995), and philosophical orientations (Buono & Nichols, 1985), our understanding of drivers of stakeholder integration is limited. This study closes this gap by examining the effects of CEO social ties on stakeholder integration capability.…”

Towards a comprehensive framework to analyse the benefits of openness for sustainability‐oriented innovation: A systematic literature review

“…In that regard, previous studies have proposed different ways to classify partners to collaborate. For instance, from the firm's perspective, stakeholders can be categorised as internal and external (Mart et al, 2016). In that sense, for the purposes of this study, external stakeholders are 'those who are outside organisational boundaries (thus excluding employees) and do not have ownership of the firm in any way (thus excluding owners, investors and shareholders)' (Ghassim, 2018, p. 16).…”

The market access of innovation in health care: insights from EC-funded research

“…Moreover, being the reference context extremely dynamic, the relevance of different stakeholders may vary over time. Therefore, literature from the network analysis suggests that managing multiple stakeholders requires a set of robust capabilities (Vaquero Martín et al , 2016) to address these challenges.…”