Stakeholder Engagement and ANP Best Research Practices in Sustainable Territorial and Urban Strategic Planning

González-Urango, Hannia; Mu, Enrique; García‐Melón, Mónica

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89277-7_5

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 173 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 1. Methodology comparison of the previous study 68,30,62,80,13,1,3,66,22,19,70,48,7,20,15,79,4,2,41 While these methods offer valuable insights, there remains a need for an innovative approach that can comprehensively address the intricacies of sustainability while considering the unique challenges faced by PARAMEL or organizations in Indonesia and SEA.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systems thinking approach for strategy evolution in the Indonesian energy corporation towards sustainable organization

Romantyo,

Anggoro

2023

International Conference on Mathematical and Statistical Physics, Computational Science, Education and Communication (ICMSCE 20

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systems thinking approach for strategy evolution in the Indonesian energy corporation towards sustainable organization

Romantyo,

Anggoro

2023

International Conference on Mathematical and Statistical Physics, Computational Science, Education and Communication (ICMSCE 20

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The selection of which specific MCDA method to use depends on the context [18,19]. For example, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been used in stakeholder engagement processes that take on transport problems [20,21], the Analytic Network Process (ANP) has been used to actively involve stakeholders in urban planning decision making [22], and the Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) was applied before in a participative process for the assessment of future renewable energy scenarios [23].…”

Section: Mcda/m and Mamcamentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Potential of MAMCA as a Framework for Stakeholder Engagement during the Setup of Energy Communities

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current energy transition is characterized by a high level of consumer and prosumer involvement. Energy communities (ECs) are instruments that fit into this trend, as they organize the collective and mainly citizen-driven exchange of clean energy. Most stakeholder engagement research for ECs focuses on one aspect such as awareness raising or deployment acceptance. Hitherto, no specific research has been conducted on a participatory approach that can be applied throughout all the phases of an EC setup and for different purposes. In our study, we determine how the Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria analysis (MAMCA) methodology can be used as an engagement tool for this purpose. By linking potential engagement goals and their connected tools and techniques to the corresponding MAMCA step, we have created a multi-layered practical framework that can be used by all types of EC initiators for stakeholder engagement throughout the setup of a new EC. As this practical tool stimulates solutions that cater better to stakeholder needs, it can contribute to smoother deployment and an associated increase in ECs in the general system. A theoretical evaluation and a performed case study demonstrate the utility of the methodology that is developed in this paper.

show abstract

“…In conclusion, "decision-content" and "decision analysis" are two of the three intertwined but different dimensions of decision-making and can be approached with a MCDM analyst consulting with experts about the decision or with decision experts learning a friendly MCDM methodology, like the AHP/ANP, to perform their own analysis. The third aspect of MCDM is the "decision-maker" and this recognition has led to the development of behavioral decision-making in the case of individuals (Simon, 1955), group decision-making in the case of groups or teams (Saaty & Peniwati, 2008) and public decision-making in the case of decisions affecting a large number of stakeholders (Gonzalez-Urango et al, 2021); however, this constitutes a topic for future discussions.…”

Section: Multicriteria Decision Making As Interdisciplinary Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multicriteria Decision Making as Interdisciplinary Research

Mu¹

2023

IJAHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In their excellent recounting of the development of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) from its early history to the 21st century, Koksalan et al. (2011) proposed that MCDM is both old and new. It is old because decision makers have always had to make tradeoffs with objectives when making decisions; the authors refer to Benjamin Franklin’s approach to making decisions by trading off benefits and costs during the 1700’s. However, MCDM as an important sub-field of Management Science or Operations research is rather new and began in the late 1950s. The elements of decision making fundamentally consist of the “decision”, a “decision-maker” and a “decision analysis methodology.” This is the reason that the MCDM field is inherently interdisciplinary.

show abstract

Stakeholder Engagement and ANP Best Research Practices in Sustainable Territorial and Urban Strategic Planning

Cited by 10 publications

References 173 publications

Systems thinking approach for strategy evolution in the Indonesian energy corporation towards sustainable organization

Systems thinking approach for strategy evolution in the Indonesian energy corporation towards sustainable organization

Evaluating the Potential of MAMCA as a Framework for Stakeholder Engagement during the Setup of Energy Communities

Multicriteria Decision Making as Interdisciplinary Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About