Stakeholder Consultations

Bunea, Adriana

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_59-1

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consulting Stakeholders. Stakeholder consultation is convening and engaging involved parties in the design, formulation, and evaluation of policies and legislation (Bunea, 2020). Consultation is a practice of building a collaborative culture since the voices of stakeholders like the community, parents, teachers, staff, and students are valued (Fullan & Edwards, 2022).…”

Section: B Best Practices In Collaborative School Culturementioning

confidence: 99%

An Integrative Literature Review of Collaborative School Culture: Basis for a Proposed Model

Valera

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaborative school culture brings administrators, faculty, students, parents, and the community to work together harmoniously for school improvement and student achievement. This type of culture is considered a crucial solution to the future of education. Many studies have been conducted on collaborative school culture but focused on the roles of leaders or teachers. Hence, this study investigates what the literature says about collaborative school cultures, the best practices of schools in fostering and sustaining collaborative cultures, and the roles of stakeholders such as leaders, teachers, parents, and the community in developing a holistic model of collaborative school culture. This benefits school administrators, faculty, and students by providing ideal collaborative practices and methods for sustaining collaborative cultures that can serve as a blueprint for schools to achieve their mission, vision, and goals. Using an integrative literature review, this paper explored empirical and theoretical studies from 2010 to 2022. Findings show that schools with strong collaborative cultures create leadership teams, conduct teacher forums, organize peer-to-peer observations, connect and partner with other sectors, consult stakeholders, collaborate in research and publications, and celebrate growth and acknowledge shortcomings. To sustain a collaborative culture, schools monitor and strengthen collaborative practices with relentless consistency, coach one another about collaboration, develop employees to build capacity centered on dispositions and skills that help them collaborate, promote continuous learning and reflection, and establish collaborative relationships. This review reinforces the idea that schools that work and learn together grow stronger, handle disruptions better, and can innovate deeper.

show abstract

Section: B Best Practices In Collaborative School Culturementioning

confidence: 99%

An Integrative Literature Review of Collaborative School Culture: Basis for a Proposed Model

Valera

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Under salience, the Commission has begun to seek public opinion in issue-specific surveys, with citizen support becoming 'an important resource in agenda-setting' (Haverland et al 2018: 330). During policy formation, the Commission has broadened its consultation processes to include 'outside' stakeholders beyond its established networks and audiences (Bunea 2017).…”

Section: The Politics Of Legislative Priority: the Theoretical Argumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2018: 330). During policy formation, the Commission has broadened its consultation processes to include ‘outside’ stakeholders beyond its established networks and audiences (Bunea 2017).…”

Section: The Politics Of Legislative Priority: the Theoretical Argumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agenda‐setting under pressure: Does domestic politics influence the European Commission?

Koop

Reh

Bressanelli

2021

European J Political Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The European Union (EU) has become increasingly visible and contested over the past decades. Several studies have shown that domestic pressure has made the EU's 'electorally connected' institutions more responsive. Yet, we still know little about how politicisation has affected the Union's non-majoritarian institutions. We address this question by focusing on agenda-setting and ask whether and how domestic politics influences the prioritisation of legislative proposals by the European Commission. We argue that the Commission, as both a policy-seeker and a survival-driven bureaucracy, will respond to domestic issue salience and Euroscepticism, at party, mass and electoral level, through targeted performance and through aggregate restraint. Building on new data on the prioritisation of legislative proposals under the ordinary legislative procedure , our analysis shows that the Commission's choice to prioritise is responsive to the salience of policy issues for Europe's citizens. By contrast, our evidence suggests that governing parties' issue salience does not drive, and Euroscepticism does not constrain, the Commission's priority-setting. Our findings contribute to the literature on multilevel politics, shedding new light on the strategic responses of non-majoritarian institutions to the domestic politicisation of 'Europe'.

show abstract

Access and Influence in Planning

Mazzoleni

2022

disP - The Planning Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stakeholder Consultations

Cited by 3 publications

References 33 publications

An Integrative Literature Review of Collaborative School Culture: Basis for a Proposed Model

An Integrative Literature Review of Collaborative School Culture: Basis for a Proposed Model

Agenda‐setting under pressure: Does domestic politics influence the European Commission?

Access and Influence in Planning

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About