2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2017.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis to evaluate the stakeholders of a MSWM system – A pilot study of Maputo City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of the stakeholder analysis, together with that of their networks and the influence of different categories in decision-making processes, has been highlighted by many authors [39,40], although the use of network analysis in the forestry sector is still in its infancy. In fact, only in the recent past have some authors applied Social Network Analysis to forestry stakeholders, for instance, Paletto et al [38] and Yamaki [37], and this technique is deemed to be appropriate for describing small yet highly interconnected networks, such as those typically found in the forestry sector.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the stakeholder analysis, together with that of their networks and the influence of different categories in decision-making processes, has been highlighted by many authors [39,40], although the use of network analysis in the forestry sector is still in its infancy. In fact, only in the recent past have some authors applied Social Network Analysis to forestry stakeholders, for instance, Paletto et al [38] and Yamaki [37], and this technique is deemed to be appropriate for describing small yet highly interconnected networks, such as those typically found in the forestry sector.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SA addresses the characteristics of stakeholders, while SNA explores the relationship structures of stakeholders. In several studies, these two research approaches have been combined to reveal the system of stakeholders, as one method can probe the system in a way the other method cannot achieve in depth [ 31 , 78 , 86 ]. In this paper, the mixed approach of SA and SNA was adopted to enrich the integral understanding of the findings, which are explained in the discussion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Aaltonen and Kujala (2016) that more and more have information can influence or increase knowledge of someone and with this knowledge can lead to awareness that eventually someone will behave in accordance with the knowledge they have. Information can be said as knowledge gained from learning, experience, or instruction (Muchangos, Tokai & Hanashima, 2017). This term has many meanings depending on the context, and in general is closely related to concepts such as meaning, knowledge, perception, truth, representation, stimulus, communication, and mental stimulation (Slabá, 2016).…”
Section: Sources Of Information: Essence and Variousmentioning
confidence: 99%