2013 36th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2013.6614021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stair case detection and recognition using ultrasonic signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the selection of the type and number of sensors should be made in a manner that has no effects on the first two techniques but improves the ability of obstacle detection and extends the range beyond the physical length of the cane. Only a few studies (Bouhamed, Kallel & Masmoudi, 2013; Nada et al, 2015; Okayasu, 2010; Pyun et al, 2013) attempted to supplement the shorelining technique only. The design of the virtual white cane needs attention, as the nonavailability of the physical cane affects the echolocation and shorelining capabilities of the users, although they do support obstacle detection due to their inherent design for detecting obstacles.…”
Section: Summary Of Key Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the selection of the type and number of sensors should be made in a manner that has no effects on the first two techniques but improves the ability of obstacle detection and extends the range beyond the physical length of the cane. Only a few studies (Bouhamed, Kallel & Masmoudi, 2013; Nada et al, 2015; Okayasu, 2010; Pyun et al, 2013) attempted to supplement the shorelining technique only. The design of the virtual white cane needs attention, as the nonavailability of the physical cane affects the echolocation and shorelining capabilities of the users, although they do support obstacle detection due to their inherent design for detecting obstacles.…”
Section: Summary Of Key Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the selection of the type and number of sensors should be made in a manner that has no effects on the first two techniques but improves the ability of obstacle detection and extends the range beyond the physical length of the cane. Only a few studies (Bouhamed et al 2013;Nada et al 2015;Okayasu 2010;Pyun et al 2013) attempted to supplement the shorelining technique only. The design of the virtual white cane needs attention, as the nonavailability of the physical cane affects the echolocation and shorelining capabilities of the users, although they do support obstacle detection due to their inherent design for detecting obstacles.…”
Section: The Use Of Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic travel aids use distance measurements, inertial measurements, position information, or images to perceive the environment and convey that information to the user with audio or tactile feedback (table S1). For collision avoidance, some electronic travel aids rely on distance measurements from ultrasonic or light detection and ranging (LIDAR) sensors mounted to a white cane (24) or the user's body (25) to detect nearby obstacles, obstacles at head height (26), or drop-offs (27,28). Electronic travel aids can perform outdoor wayfinding with position information from GPS (29) or indoor wayfinding in specific locations with preplaced position sensors (30,31) or environment maps (32,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%