2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stainless steel ennoblement in freshwater: From exposure tests to mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same phenomenon was observed by Marconnet et al [18] while following the evolution of the free potential of corrosion with time on samples of steel immersed in fresh water during 18 days in spring. They obtained curves presenting oscillations similar to those obtained in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The same phenomenon was observed by Marconnet et al [18] while following the evolution of the free potential of corrosion with time on samples of steel immersed in fresh water during 18 days in spring. They obtained curves presenting oscillations similar to those obtained in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Along with PRB colonization and development, metallic electrodes allowed the observation of significant increases of electrochemical potentials, reaching plateaus in the range of ϩ80 to ϩ120 mV/SCE for stainless steel and Ϫ70 to ϩ60 mV/SCE for copper electrodes, comparable with those obtained for lotic freshwater biofilms on stainless steel supports (19,44). Mechanisms reported to be responsible for electrochemical potential increases include production by biofilm microorganisms of oxidizing agents through enzyme catalysis, e.g., H 2 O 2 or manganese oxide in manganese-rich environments; modification of the composition of the oxide layer of stainless steel; and production of some compounds that adsorb on the material surface and play the role of electro-catalysts (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Mechanisms reported to be responsible for electrochemical potential increases include production by biofilm microorganisms of oxidizing agents through enzyme catalysis, e.g., H 2 O 2 or manganese oxide in manganese-rich environments; modification of the composition of the oxide layer of stainless steel; and production of some compounds that adsorb on the material surface and play the role of electro-catalysts (33). While electroactivity has been described mainly for bacterial strains, previous studies demonstrated that algae were also involved (34,48), causing day-night fluctuations of the electrochemical potential recorded on stainless steel (44). Algae modify the local production of O 2 through photosynthesis, contributing to an increase of the recorded electrochemical potentials during photosynthesis periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential of both samples shifts towards the positive direction, eventually stabilising with immersion time due to the formation of a passive film on the steel surface. This increase, often termed 'ennoblement', is generally associated with an increase of the cathodic reaction rate (O 2 reduction in aerated water, that favours oxide film formation) [22][23][24]. The cathodic reaction decreases as a result of the formation of a passive film which in turn increases the resistance to electron transfer through the film and decreases the electrochemical activity of the surface.…”
Section: Secm Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, OCP values for both materials increase and this increase diminishes with immersion time due to the passive film formation. According to the literature [22][23][24], an increase in OCP is associated with an increase in the rate of the cathodic reaction. Therefore, when the passive film grows and diminishes the cathodic activity of the electrode surface, the rate of change of the OCP would also be expected to diminish.…”
Section: Secm Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%