2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma – The past, the present and the future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current AJCC TNM staging system for NPC is based on the anatomical extent of the tumor [24]. Tumor volume has been proposed as an independent prognostic factor besides T classification in patients with NPC [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current AJCC TNM staging system for NPC is based on the anatomical extent of the tumor [24]. Tumor volume has been proposed as an independent prognostic factor besides T classification in patients with NPC [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies [32,33] have reported that T1-2N1 disease had poorer outcomes and might benefit from combined treatments. There is also increasing evidence that primary tumor volume could be a significant factor for local control independent of T stage [34]. In addition to anatomical tumor stage and volume, plasma EBV DNA may aid further risk stratifications.…”
Section: Evolving Role Of Induction Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Currently, the prognosis for NPC patients is based on histological classification combined with information on the tumor size and location. 5,6 These factors are important for the detection of NPC and determining the disease stage. However, varying outcomes of clinical treatment have been reported for NPC patients with the same stage of disease treated using comparable methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%