2009
DOI: 10.1002/cjg2.1457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staggered‐Grid High‐Order Finite‐Difference Method in Elastic Wave Simulation with Variable Grids and Local Time‐Steps

Abstract: Accuracy and efficiency are most urgent problems in elastic wave simulation. Staggered‐grid is an effective method to improve the accuracy with high efficiency. By the combination of variable grids and locally variable time‐steps, a staggered‐grid high‐order finite‐difference method with oddly arbitrarily variable spatial grids and arbitrarily variable local time‐steps is presented. The numerical results show that the simulation accuracy and efficiency are increased effectively by avoiding oversampling both in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In transition zone, points in smaller step domain related to derivative calculation should be the same distance to central points with the relevant points in coarser step domain. In transition zone, modified spatial derivative difference scheme is [7]…”
Section: Finite Difference Scheme Of Gird Variation Methods With Pml Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In transition zone, points in smaller step domain related to derivative calculation should be the same distance to central points with the relevant points in coarser step domain. In transition zone, modified spatial derivative difference scheme is [7]…”
Section: Finite Difference Scheme Of Gird Variation Methods With Pml Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal steps could be changed along with spatial steps [4] . Ten-fold grid variation method could be seen in resent literature [7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is hard to determine which of the two schemes is more accurate and efficient. Although the SG scheme has sometimes been regarded as more precise than the CG scheme (Huang and Dong, 2009), there is also some theoretical and experimental proof in the literature that does not support this proposition. Moczo et al (2011) compared the accuracy of the different finite-difference schemes with respect to the P -wave to S-wave speed ratio using theoretical analysis and numerical experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to using a nonuniform grid, these methods rely on either wavefield interpolation (i.e. upsampling) or varying weighting coefficients using Taylor expansion (Huang C and Dong LG, 2009). We know that Taylor expansion has high accuracy only when the variables are close to the expansion point; thus, the finite‐difference method using Taylor expansion would encounter numerical dispersions when using a nonuniform grid within a thick transition zone between a coarse grid and a fine grid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%