1993
DOI: 10.1057/jit.1993.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stages of growth in end-user computing: applications in the health sector of developing countries in Asia-Pacific

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jayasuriya [7] has discussed the growth of end-user computing, using a framework where structure, technology, and people are interrelated and mutually adjusting benchmark areas. In a similar way, our research built a composite analytical framework where each stage of e-government interoperability was described in three different, but related, aspects: (1) organizational interoperability, (2) semantic interoperability, and (3) technical interoperability.…”
Section: Empirical Model Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jayasuriya [7] has discussed the growth of end-user computing, using a framework where structure, technology, and people are interrelated and mutually adjusting benchmark areas. In a similar way, our research built a composite analytical framework where each stage of e-government interoperability was described in three different, but related, aspects: (1) organizational interoperability, (2) semantic interoperability, and (3) technical interoperability.…”
Section: Empirical Model Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The names of stages and the benchmark variables by which they are measured differ to some extent, as is evident from the plethora of SoG models that have been developed over the past 40 years. However, all SoG models purport that ISs evolve through a number of stages, with respect to their use and management, and increase in sophistication and complexity as their application becomes more significant and mission critical (Chan and Swatman, 2004;Damsgaard and Scheepers, 1999;de Brí, 2009;de Bruin et al, 2005;Duane and Finnegan, 2003;Earl, 1989;Forrester, 2012;García et al, 2013;Gibson and Nolan, 1974;Gottschalk and Khandelwal, 2004;Gottschalk and Solli-Saether, 2010;Jacobs and Nakata, 2010;Janssen and van Veenstra, 2005;Jayasuriya, 1993;Jeffery and Leliveld, 2004;Kazanjian, 1988;King and Teo, 1997;KPMG, 1997;Layne and Lee, 2001;Lingling, 2011;Magal et al, 1988;McFarlan and McKenney, 1982;Nikhil et al, 2007;Rao et al, 2003;Rocha, 2012). The following sections discuss the development and use of SoG models over the past 40 years, including recent SoG models for social media, before discussing the dominant problems associated with social media.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Brugha (1998) disputes this approach and suggests that it is more beneficial to focus on activities rather than outputs, as they are less contextual and because activities provide decision makers with better indicators of what to do at each stage. Numerous other authors have proposed theoretical stages of IS growth models based on these models for a variety of purposes, including end user computing (Huff et al, 1988;Jayasuriya, 1993), information centres (Magal et al, 1988), technology-based new ventures (Kazanjian, 1988), IS planning (King and Teo, 1997) and IT portfolio management (Jeffery and Leliveld, 2004), and for the most part, empirical testing of the stages proposed in these models has been positive.…”
Section: Stages-of-growth (Sog) Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach is disputed as it is more beneficial to focus on activities rather than outputs, as they are less contextual, and because activities provide decision makers with better indicators of what to do at each stage [15]. Numerous other authors have proposed theoretical stages of IS growth models based on these models, for a variety of purposes including end user computing [16,17], information centres [18], technology based new ventures [19], IS planning [20] and IT portfolio management [21], and for the most part, empirical testing of the stages proposed in these models has been positive.…”
Section: Stages Of Growth (Sog) Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%