1973
DOI: 10.1002/he.36919730108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stages of faculty development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In explaining the theory of cognitive dissonance, a number of experts in developmental psychology have noted that the presentation of challenging, novel situations often forces individuals to extend themselves beyond their current stage of development to more advanced stages in order to deal with the psychological disequilibrium these events create (Festinger, 1957;Ralph, 1973 ;Schein, 1961 ;Gaff, Festa and Gaff, 1978).…”
Section: Summary Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In explaining the theory of cognitive dissonance, a number of experts in developmental psychology have noted that the presentation of challenging, novel situations often forces individuals to extend themselves beyond their current stage of development to more advanced stages in order to deal with the psychological disequilibrium these events create (Festinger, 1957;Ralph, 1973 ;Schein, 1961 ;Gaff, Festa and Gaff, 1978).…”
Section: Summary Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Existing studies include numerous investigations of teachers beginning their careers in elementary and secondary settings (Veenman, 1984). Other research documents the career stages of university professors (Baldwin & Blackburn, 1981;Blackburn, 1979;Cyntrynbaum, Lee, & Wadner, 1982;Mathis, 1979;Ralph, 1973). Little is known, however, about graduate students as they begin work as teachers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ralph, for instance, explains the professional growth of individual faculty members by reference to a multistage model of increasing intellectual complexity [16]. De Bloois and Adler postulate a series of stages in the evolution of single-campus instructional improvement programs, the first of which resembles the first stage of the model described here [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%